S. Van Den Eynde, «Crying to God Prayer and Plot in the Book of Judith», Vol. 85 (2004) 217-231
If prayers are defined as communication in which prayers receive a response from God, this implies that they have a function as regards the plot of a story. As a test case, the impact of praying on the plot as well as the characterisation in the book of Judith (containing 21 references to praying) is analysed. The specific characterisation of God through prayer affects the plot. Apart from their importance for characterisation and plot, the prayers in Judith contribute in their own way to the development of its main theme: who is truly God, Nebuchadnezzar or YHWH?
220 S. Van Den Eynde
them, and, since this is a petition, is willing to interfere and grant their
request.
The actual effect of these prayers on the plot is clear: God hears
their prayer (Jdt 4,13). Actually, this is the only direct action of God
mentioned in the whole book. The formulation of this verse reminds
one of Exod 2,24-25, and Exod 3,7. In the exodus story, God’s hearing
and seeing involves delivering his people and sending Moses to make
that happen. The intertextuality (10) suggests that God again will deliver
his people by sending someone to lead them. The readers will
consequently interpret the deliverance of the people through Judith’s
actions in a similar way as God’s delivering of the people by sending
Moses. That the characters of the story do not know of God’s
reaction (11), has an effect on the plot as well. The people keep on
fasting and offering, the priests keep on praying (Jdt 4,15). Since they
do not realise they are being heard, the people of Bethulia eventually
even come to the conclusion that this situation of military crisis must
be God’s punishment for their sins and those of their fathers (Jdt
7,28) (12) and they want to surrender.
The conclusion of the people contrasts with that of their opponent
Achior in Jdt 5. Achior advises against attacking Bethulia if the people
did not sin against their God, since this God will avenge them. In order
to make his point, he recalls the events in Egypt. The prayers of the
people had a clear effect upon the events: God struck Egypt with
plagues (Jdt 5,12). It is part of the irony in the book, that the enemy
Achior displays more confidence in the possible effect of the prayers
of Israel than the Israelites do. For despite the repeated prayers of the
inhabitants of Bethulia (Jdt 6,19; 7,19.29) and those of their leaders
(10) Other references to the Exodus and wilderness stories, are: the image of
horses and riders as symbol of power, the “Lord who crushes war†(Jdt 7,9; 16,2;
Exod 15,3[LXX]), the plagues in Egypt (Jdt 5,11-12), the acknowledgement of
YHWH as the ultimate goal of the deliverance of Israel (see Jdt 9,14; Exod 6,7;
7,5; 8,18; 9,14; etc.), and the stories about Massa and Meriba (Exod 17; Numb 20;
Jdt 7,23ff). For this last aspect, see J.H. VAN HENTEN, “Judith as Alternative
Leader. A Rereading of Judith 7-13â€, A Feminist Companion to Esther, Judith
and Susanna (ed. A. BRENNER) (The Feminist Companion to the Bible 7;
Sheffield 1995) 224-252.
(11) Even Judith, who trusts till the end that God will save his people, seems
to be unaware that God already heard their prayer. See 8,17: “he will hear us if it
pleases himâ€.
(12) As remarked by T. CRAVEN, “‘From Where Will My Help Come?’
Women and Prayer in the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical Booksâ€, Worship and the
Hebrew Bible (ed. M.P. GRAHAM) (JSOTSS 284; Sheffield 1999) 95-109, 105.