Kenneth D. Litwak, «Israel’s Prophets Meet Athens’ Philosophers: Scriptural Echoes in Acts 17,22-31», Vol. 85 (2004) 199-216
Generally, treatments of Paul’s speech note biblical parallels to Paul’s wording but find no further significance to these biblical allusions. This study argues that Luke intends far more through this use of the Scriptures of Israel beyond merely providing sources for Paul’s language. I contend that, through the narrative technique of "framing in discourse", Luke uses the Scriptures of Israel to lead his audience to interpret Paul’s speech as standing in continuity with anti-idol polemic of Israel’s prophets in the past. As such, read as historiography, Luke’s narrative uses this continuity to legitimate Paul’s message and by implication, the faith of Luke’s audience. Luke’s use of the Scriptures here is ecclesiological.
204 Kenneth D. Litwak
know that he is God and there is no other. These verses are not echoed
by Paul as such but the ideas they express are clearly present, just as
many of the statements throughout the Areopagus address reflect
elements of the anti-idol polemic of Isaiah 40–48: the inability of idols
to speak, see or help, the foolishness of bowing down to something
that is made with human hands, especially when part of the original
tree was used to cook the worshiper’s dinner and the view that God is
transcendent above all, and cannot therefore be represented by
anything. Isaiah’s assertions that idolaters and makers of idols do not
know is interesting in light of Paul’s words in Acts 17,23 concerning
the “unknown godâ€. Paul says that what the Athenians worship
ignorantly he will proclaim to them. Paul seeks to correct their
ignorance, just as Isaiah proclaims to his people the true God as
opposed to the idols they worship without knowledge of the true God.
Paul refers to the altar of the unknown god in Acts 17,23a, the ignorant
worship of the Athenians in 17,23b, the groping after God in 17,27 and
God’s overlooking of the times of ignorance in Acts 17,30. Clearly, the
failure of Paul’s audience to recognize the true God is an important
theme in Paul’s speech, as well as in many scriptural intertexts which
may lie behind the speech. Thus, Paul’s discourse begins by echoing
themes expressed by Israel’s prophets, especially Isaiah (16).
b) God as Creator: Acts 17,24
Paul continues to echo the Scriptures of Israel in Acts 17,24. There
are two main parts to this verse. The first is the assertion that God
made the world and all that is in it. This statement echoes an extensive
scriptural tradition. All of Genesis 1 describes this process, while the
specific assertion that God created the world may be found in Gen 1,1
and 2,1-4. Isaiah calls upon his audience to consider who God is, based
upon his activity as creator of the stars (cf. Isa 40,25-26). Isa 40,28 ties
together the idea of knowing who God is and his activity as creator.
This verse joins two of the themes of Paul’s speech. First, Paul tells the
(16) It is reasonable to see echoes of Isaiah here as Isaiah’s words are
explicitly cited elsewhere in Luke-Acts, e.g., Luke 3,4-6; 4,17-19; 8,10; Acts
13,47. These clear quotations from Isaiah, especially Isaiah 40-49, justify seeing
more subtle, intertextual echoes of Isaiah in Paul’s speech at the Areopagus.
Dubarle (“Le Discoursâ€, 581) argues that the order of the elements in Paul’s
speech follows the order in Isaiah 45, although it integrates other scriptural texts
as well. I find his parallels suggestive and helpful for seeing the echoed traditions
behind Paul’s words, but am not convinced that Isaiah 45 actually provided the
order for the statements in Acts 17,22-31.