Kenneth D. Litwak, «Israel’s Prophets Meet Athens’ Philosophers: Scriptural Echoes in Acts 17,22-31», Vol. 85 (2004) 199-216
Generally, treatments of Paul’s speech note biblical parallels to Paul’s wording but find no further significance to these biblical allusions. This study argues that Luke intends far more through this use of the Scriptures of Israel beyond merely providing sources for Paul’s language. I contend that, through the narrative technique of "framing in discourse", Luke uses the Scriptures of Israel to lead his audience to interpret Paul’s speech as standing in continuity with anti-idol polemic of Israel’s prophets in the past. As such, read as historiography, Luke’s narrative uses this continuity to legitimate Paul’s message and by implication, the faith of Luke’s audience. Luke’s use of the Scriptures here is ecclesiological.
Israel’s Prophets Meet Athens’ Philosophers 209
with the seeking of God that shall come afterwards. The wording of
Psalm 113 parallels closely Paul’s polemic. The logic of Acts 17,29 is
based on a sequence of assertions. First, humans are God’s offspring.
Since humans are the works of God, nothing that humans can make
can represent God. If this is so, then nothing that such lesser beings
can make can equal the superior God who made them. Since humans
are like God, and humans are not like any material thing, God is not
like any material representation, be it stone, silver or gold, all of
which are lesser than humans. Both the psalmist (ei[dwla tw'n ejqnw'n
ajrguvrion kai; crusivon) and Paul (crusw/' h] ajrguvrw/ h] livqw/,
caragmati tevcnh") assert the inferiority of images made of gold and
v
silver. Paul’s statement especially echoes the anti-idol polemic of
Isaiah. Isa 40,18-20 says that no likeness can be made of God: “to
what will you liken the Lord and to what likeness will you liken him?â€
Like Paul, Isaiah notes that gold and silver are used for idols (mh;
eikona ejpoivhsen tevktwn h] crusocovo" cwneuvsa" crusivon) (Isa 40,18-
jv
19), but should not be used for the true God (31). (Cf. the similar
vocabulary and polemic in Isa 46,5-6). Isa 44,9-20 also expresses
the same scriptural tradition. Isa 44,19 particularly mocks the
construction of idols, noting that one who builds idols cuts down
trees, and uses them both for fire and for an idol. Such an idol is
obviously not a real god nor worthy of homage as the one true God,
who made us all, is due. Paul’s message then at several points reflects
and recalls the message of the prophet Isaiah in condemning the
attempt to make an image to represent God.
g) God will Judge People in the Future: Acts 17,31
Paul’s assertion that God is going to judge the world in Acts 17,31
also echoes a common scriptural tradition. Paul asserts that God has
set a day when he will judge the world in righteousness. This echoes
the words of the psalmists:
Ps 9,9 Acts 17,31
Ps 97,9
Ps 95,13b
e[sthsen hJmevran ejn h|/
o{ti h[kei kri'nai th;n
oti e;rcetai kri'nai
{
kai; auvto;" krinei'
mevllei krivnein
ghn krinei'
/
thn gh'n krinei'
;
th;n oijkoumevnhn ejn
th;n oijkoumevnhn ejn
th;n oijkoumevnhn ejn
th;n oijkoumevnhn ejn
dikaiosuvnh/
dikaiosuvnh/
dikaiosuvnh'/
dikaiosuvnh/
(31) PAO, Isaianic New Exodus, 196 asserts that “in Acts 17:29 one...finds the
climax of this piece of anti-idol polemic that should be understood within the
wider framework of the anti-idol polemic in Isaiahâ€.