Kenneth D. Litwak, «Israel’s Prophets Meet Athens’ Philosophers: Scriptural Echoes in Acts 17,22-31», Vol. 85 (2004) 199-216
Generally, treatments of Paul’s speech note biblical parallels to Paul’s wording but find no further significance to these biblical allusions. This study argues that Luke intends far more through this use of the Scriptures of Israel beyond merely providing sources for Paul’s language. I contend that, through the narrative technique of "framing in discourse", Luke uses the Scriptures of Israel to lead his audience to interpret Paul’s speech as standing in continuity with anti-idol polemic of Israel’s prophets in the past. As such, read as historiography, Luke’s narrative uses this continuity to legitimate Paul’s message and by implication, the faith of Luke’s audience. Luke’s use of the Scriptures here is ecclesiological.
212 Kenneth D. Litwak
understand Paul’s speech generically. Having established that Luke
uses the Scriptures of Israel, through framing in discourse, to lead his
audience to expect Paul’s speech to be an instance of prophetic anti-
idol polemic, the next question is, Why would Luke do this?
a) Scriptural Echoes and Continuity through Framing in Discourse
Luke takes this approach in order to show continuity between
Paul’s message and the message of the prophets. The oracles of the
prophets against idolatry teach that idols are false gods. Paul argues
that idols are not the true God, but that the Athenians are ignorant of
the true God. The prophets assert that God created everything, and
therefore cannot dwell in a temple. Paul argues that God created
everything and cannot therefore dwell in a temple. The prophets
predict a coming judgment by God against those who seek idols. Paul
promises a day when God will judge those who seek idols. These
points of similarity, and the characterization of Paul’s speech as the
anti-idol polemic of Israelite prophets, means that Paul’s speech stands
in the same stream of scriptural tradition as the prophetic critiques
made by Isaiah, Jeremiah and other prophets concerning idols. These
connections between Paul’s speech and that of Israel’s prophets of old
show a continuity in message and emphases between Israel’s prophetic
oracles and Paul’s speech.
Also arguing that Luke was concerned with continuity between
Israel in the past and Christians in his day, G.W. Trompf has shown
that Luke, like Polybius and other Hellenistic historiographers, built
“recurrence†and “reenactment†into his narrative. Luke crafted his
narrative to present events in Luke-Acts as reenactments of events in
the Scriptures of Israel. According to Trompf, Luke was not simply
interested in fleeting allusions to past parallels, or making orderly
pesharim on long sequences in the Scriptures, or using “prophecy
fulfillment†to authenticate Jesus. Rather, “Luke was fundamentally
interested in...directly historical connections as an historian of the
Hellenistic periodâ€. Luke wrote as though historical events, which he
saw as divinely guided, had their own interconnections “between
events amounting to the virtual reenactment of special happenings or
the repetition of an earlier stage of history in a later one†(34). Trompf
demonstrates that this same notion of recurrence may be found in
historians in the Scriptures of Israel. The Deuteronomist, for example,
(34) G.W. TROMPF, The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought.
From Antiquity to the Reformation (Berkeley 1979) 129.