Richard Whitekettle, «How the Sheep of Judah Became Fish: Habakkuk 1,14 and the Davidic Monarchy.», Vol. 96 (2015) 273-281
In Hab 1,14, Habakkuk complained that God had made the human targets of Babylonian aggression to be like leaderless aquatic animals. Aquatic animals are leaderless, not because they have a leader who is absent or inept, but because they simply have no leaders. Habakkuk was complaining then that God had made the targets of Babylonian aggression to have no governance system of their own. He was complaining, therefore, about the cataclysm of 586 BCE, when the native political system in Judah - the Davidic monarchy and its administrative apparatus - ceased to exist and the people of Judah were absorbed into the Babylonian Empire.
06_AN_Whitekettle_273_281_273_281 10/07/15 12:42 Pagina 278
278 RICHARD WHITEKETTLE
monarch was weak or corrupt. And the people who were deported to Baby-
lon in 597 ― King Jehoiachin, members of the royal household, and mem-
bers of the elite ― would have thought of themselves as a (displaced) part
of the Davidic polity, which was still in operation back in their homeland.
In 586, however, the Babylonians brought the Davidic polity to an
end, established a different political apparatus in Judah, and deported a
portion of the Judahite population to Babylon 10. From that moment on,
those living in the land of Judah were no longer under the authority of
their own leaders and no longer members of their own polity. And for the
Judahites who had been deported, whether in 597 or 586, there was no
Davidic polity of which they could consider themselves to be (displaced)
members.
In sum, beginning in 586, the people who lived in the land of Judah,
and those who had been deported to Babylon, had no political leaders,
political system, or political identity of their own. Thus, Habakkuk’s com-
plaint in 1,14, that God had made the group of people who were the targets
of Babylonian aggression structurally leaderless, referred to the cataclysm
which took place in 586, when the native political system in Judah ― the
Davidic monarchy and its administrative apparatus ― ceased to exist, and
the people of Judah were politically absorbed into the vast net of the
Babylonian Empire.
10
On Gedaliah’s function, see J. WEINBERG, “Gedaliah, the Son of Ahikam
in Mizpah: His Status and Role, Supporters and Opponents”, ZAW 119 (2007)
356-368; K-D. SCHUNK, “Die Funktion Gedaljas und der Status des Landes
Juda unter Nebukadnezzar II”, Geschichte Israels und deuteronomistisches
Geschichtsdenken. Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Winfried Theil (eds.
P. MOMMER – A. SCHERER) (AOAT 380; Münster 2010) 259-264; P.-A.
BEAULIEU, “History of Israel 6: Babylonian Period”, Dictionary of the Old
Testament Historical Books (eds. B.T. ARNOLD – H.G.M. WILLIAMSON)
(Downers Grove, IL 2005) 483. It is unclear how the Babylonians governed
the area of Judah after Gedaliah’s assassination. For analyses of the situation
in the area of Judah and among those taken to Babylon, see O. LIPSCHITS, The
Fall and Rise of Jerusalem. Judah under Babylonian Rule (Winona Lake, IN
2005); MILLER – HAYES, A History, 478-497; D. VANDERHOOFT, “Babylonian
Strategies of Imperial Control in the West: Royal Practice and Rhetoric”,
Judah and the Judeans in the Neo-Babylonian Period (eds. O. LIPSCHITS – J.
BLENKINSOPP) (Winona Lake, IN 2003) 235-262; R. ALBERTZ, Israel in Exile.
The History and Literature of the Sixth Century B.C.E. (trans. D. GREEN)
(Studies in Biblical Literature 3; Atlanta, GA 2003) 45-111; J.J. AHN, Exile
as Forced Migration. A Sociological, Literary, and Theological Approach on
the Displacement and Resettlement of the Southern Kingdom of Judah
(BZAW 417; Berlin 2011) 1-35.