Richard Whitekettle, «How the Sheep of Judah Became Fish: Habakkuk 1,14 and the Davidic Monarchy.», Vol. 96 (2015) 273-281
In Hab 1,14, Habakkuk complained that God had made the human targets of Babylonian aggression to be like leaderless aquatic animals. Aquatic animals are leaderless, not because they have a leader who is absent or inept, but because they simply have no leaders. Habakkuk was complaining then that God had made the targets of Babylonian aggression to have no governance system of their own. He was complaining, therefore, about the cataclysm of 586 BCE, when the native political system in Judah - the Davidic monarchy and its administrative apparatus - ceased to exist and the people of Judah were absorbed into the Babylonian Empire.
06_AN_Whitekettle_273_281_273_281 10/07/15 12:42 Pagina 280
280 RICHARD WHITEKETTLE
announcement in 1,5-11 was first written/spoken at a time before the
Babylonians had made their presence directly felt in Judah, and so, prob-
ably before their appearance in Philistine territory in 604 14. If 1,12-17
was first written/spoken after 586, then God’s announcement in 1,5-11
and Habakkuk’s complaint in 1,12-17 were separated by many years (ca.
pre-604 for 1,5-11 and ca. post-586 for 1,12-17). This would mean that
Habakkuk had a long prophetic career, and was conscious of and was
keeping track of the long trajectory of history and divine action.
Second, although the most natural way to read the wayyiqṭol verb in
1,14 is as a reference to an actual past event, it is possible that the verb
reflects the thinking of a prophet who has, “in his mind…projected him-
self into a future point of view from which what is to come can be de-
scribed as having occurred” 15. Such a reading of the verb would mean
that the complaint in 1,14, and presumably the whole of Habakkuk’s
speech in 1,12-17, was first written/spoken prior to the cataclysm of 586,
and that Habakkuk was complaining about what he believed the Babylo-
nians would eventually do to Judah ― that is, that they would eventually
bring the Davidic polity to an end.
Several things could have led him to such a belief: 1) the ferocity of
the language in God’s announcement of the Babylonian assault (1,5-11);
2) the destruction of the nearby city-state of Ashkelon and its royal polity
by the Babylonians in 604; 3) the statements of his contemporary Jere-
miah announcing the demise of the Davidic monarchy, Jerusalem, and
several of the last Davidic kings and their lineages, all at the hands of the
Babylonians (e.g., Jer 21,1-10; 22,24-30; 32,1-5.26-35; 34,1-22; 36,27-
32; 37,3-10; 38,1-23); 4) the manipulation of the Davidic monarchy by
the Babylonians in 597, when they deported Jehoiachin and installed
Zedekiah as king (2 Kgs 24,8-17; 2 Chr 36,9-10).
In the case of a pre-586 setting for 1,14, the time structure of 1,14-17
would be the same as that described above for a post-586 setting. The ver-
bal time frames, however, would all be embedded within the visionary or
imagined future.
The issue of whether Hab 1,14 (and all of 1,12-17) was first
written/spoken before or after 586 will not be settled here. To do so would
require a thorough analysis of the relationship between 1,14-17 and the
rest of 1,12-17, the relationship between 1,12-17 and the other sections
of the book, the dates of the other sections of the book, and various other
14
ROBERTS, Nahum, 95; FLOYD, Minor Prophets, 84, 87; ANDERSEN,
Habakkuk, 168; ROBERTSON, The Books, 36-37; BAILEY, “Habakkuk”, 260, 301.
15
J. JOOSTEN, The Verbal System of Biblical Hebrew. A New Synthesis
Elaborated on the Basis of Classical Prose (JBS 10; Jerusalem 2012) 423.
See also G. HATAV, “Past and Future Interpretation of Wayyiqtol”, JSS 61
(2011) 105-107.