Nathan Eubank, «Dying with Power. Mark 15,39 from Ancient to Modern Interpretation», Vol. 95 (2014) 247-268
This article examines the reception-history of Mark 15,39 to shed new light on this pivotal and disputed verse. Mark's earliest known readers emended the text to clarify the centurion's feelings about Jesus and to explain how the centurion came to faith. Copyists inserted references to Jesus' final yell around the same time that patristic commentators were claiming that this yell was a miracle that proved Jesus' divinity, an interpretation which was enshrined in the Byzantine text and the Vulgate. The article concludes that a 'sarcastic' reading is a more adequate description of 15,39 as found in B, NA28 etc.
05_Eubank_247_268 15/07/14 12:19 Pagina 256
256 NATHAN EUBANK
Paschasius Radbertus put it, “the centurion understood something
great in the yell”. Second, Chrysostom, Ambrose, and Augustine
were defending this interpretation around the same time that the
creators of Bezae and other manuscripts were drawing attention to
Jesus’ dying yell. This suggests that the scribes who introduced
these corruptions were indeed attempting, like Matthew, Luke, and
Peter before them, to explain how the centurion could have come
to believe Jesus was the son of God 23.
4. Modern Interpreters
Modern interpreters have, by and large, perpetuated the long-
standing tendency to attempt to find something fantastic in the man-
ner of Jesus’ death. For example, Wrede avers that “Markus muss
hier meinen, dass der Hauptmann etwas Wunderbares wahrnahm,
das ihn zu seinem Bekenntnis zwang. Die Art und Weise des Ster-
bens überwältigt ihn. Der Erzähler kann dabei ― nach bekannter
Auslegung ― nur an den lauten Schrei des Sterbenden gedacht
haben oder an das Zerreissen des Tempelvorhangs” 24. Many recent
commentators, such as Raymond Brown, Joel Marcus, and Pheme
Perkins, favor the idea that the centurion saw the rending of the
temple curtain 25.
Others, such as Gundry, emphasize the importance of Jesus’
dying yell 26. Hans-Christian Kammler recently defended this read-
ing with no less conviction than patristic and medieval commenta-
tors. According to Kammler, Jesus’ dying cry was not an inarticulate
cry of a dying man. Rather, it showed “daß Jesus in seiner Passion
23
In light of this evidence it is interesting to note that Matt 27,50 portrays
Jesus giving up his spirit (avfh/ken to. pneu/ma) and in Luke 23,46 Jesus quotes
Ps 31,5 while handing over his spirit to God (pa,ter( eivj cei/ra,j sou
parati,qemai to. pneu/ma, mou). Luke moves in the direction of depicting
Jesus laying down his own life, and Matthew may be suggesting the same.
24
W. WREDE, Das Messiasgeheimnis in den Evangelien. Zugleich ein
Beitrag zum Verständnis des Markusevangeliums (Göttingen 1963) 76.
25
R. BROWN, Death of the Messiah (New York 1994) II, 1145; J. MARCUS,
Mark 8–16. A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB 27a;
New Haven, CT 2009) 1057-1058; P. PERKINS, “The Gospel of Mark”, The
New Interpreter’s Bible 8 (Nashville, TN 1995) 724.
26
M. GUNDRY, Mark. A Commentary on his Apology for the Cross (Grand
Rapids, MI 1993) 973.