Gustavo Martin, «Procedural Register in the Olivet Discourse: A Functional Linguistic Approach to Mark 13», Vol. 90 (2009) 457-483
I will rely on insights from Halliday’s register theory to explain the Markan Jesus’ use of a functional variety of language I call procedural register. The identification of procedural register in the main section of the Olivet Discourse (vv. 5b-23) will be shown to reveal the rhetorical design of the discourse within a first temporal horizon, of direct relevance for the audience and addressing the disciples’ question (v. 4). The absence of procedural register in vv. 24-27 indicates the opening of a second horizon in the speech, lacking immediate impact for the audience and no longer addressing the disciples’ question.
468 Gustavo Martin
shmei'on, the final road sign indicating that “all these things†are to be
fulfilled. Thus the first o{tan clause makes reference to “wars and
rumors of wars,†which will be heard by the disciples. In reaction to
these, they should not be alarmed, for though these things “must
happen,†the end is not yet (ou[pw to; tevlo"). The second sub-section
increases the immediacy and the urgency by means of the explicit
subject plus reflexive pronoun in blepete de; uJmei'" eJautouv". The second
v
o{tan clause makes clear that the disciples themselves will become
victims in the dreadful times ahead: When they bring you handing you
over… don’t worry about what you will say. Finally, in v. 14 the o{tan
clause becomes fully specific and detailed: When you see the
desolating sacrilege…then, let those in Judea flee to the mountains, etc.
The following verses describe the tribulation that will befall the
disciples in the near future, with specific instructions to flee and save
their lives. The tribulation notwithstanding, God has shortened those
days on behalf of His elect. In the second member of an inclusio, the
Markan Jesus refers again to the deceivers, false prophets and false
christs who will rise in order to deceive, if possible, even God’s elect.
The final clause of this sub-section delivers a clear sense of finality and
completeness, and refers anaphorically to the question of v. 4: uJmei'" de;
blevpete proei;rhka uJmi'n pavnta.
The language of this section is a rare mix of procedural and
paraenetic registers, which associates behavior with specific time
frames by means of “when X do Y†patterns, and has the highest
concentration of o{tan clauses in the entire gospel. In Mark, o{tan
clauses can carry a gnomic sense, as in the parables in chapter 4, which
contain the second highest concentration of o{tan clauses in all of
Mark, and refer to situations or processes that are assumed to be always
or generally occurring. As Pesch points out, another set of o{tan clauses
seems to have an eschatological sense (8,38; 9,9; 12,23 etc) (42), as they
refer to the time of Jesus’ coming, resurrection, or the resurrection of
the dead. In chapter 13, however, the usage is clearly different, as here
the “when†clauses are an integral part of a speech about future events,
of which its main section, 5b-23, is a set of instructions associated to
time frames progressing towards a climax. The closest examples of this
usage of o{tan in conjunction with imperatives is found in some of
Paul’s letters, as he delivers final and highly practical instructions to be
carried out when he next visits churches, when his letter is read, when
(42) PESCH, Naherwartungen, 119.