Alicia D. Myers, «Prosopopoetics and Conflict: Speech and Expectations in John 8», Vol. 92 (2011) 580-596
This article explores the conflict of John 8 within the larger context of the Gospel and in the light of the ancient rhetorical practice of prosopopoiia: the creation of speech for characters. These speeches add to the credibility of a narrative by being «appropriate» for both the person speaking and the situation in which the speech is given. Although perhaps not prosopopoiia in the traditional sense of speeches from Greek histories, this essay argues that the Gospel nevertheless includes prosopopoetics by creating appropriate, albeit unnerving, words for Jesus that elevate the audience and add to the persuasiveness of the work.
Biblica_1_Layout 1 20/01/12 11:44 Pagina 581
581
PROSOPOPOETICS AND CONFLICT: SPEECH AND EXPECTATIONS
use of prosopopoiia, John effectively gives voice to Jesus in such a
way that upsets the expectations of other characters at a key moment
in the narrative in order to reinforce the believability of his own pres-
entation for his audience.
I. Definitions of Prosopopoiia
Prosopopoiia is often associated with the lengthy speeches crafted
by Herodotus and Thucydides for great generals on the cusp of battle
or for statesmen embroiled in crucial debates. Another common as-
sociation is with the works of orators who “personified†— or better
“impersonated†— figures from the past in order to interject their
“opinions†in key court cases 3. Nevertheless, while rhetorical hand-
books and progymnasmata include such ideas of prosopopoiia in their
definitions of this technique, they do not limit the practice so precisely
(cf. Quintilian, Inst. Or. 3.8.49-54). Instead, prosopopoiia overlaps
significantly with other discussions of “attributed speech†4, particu-
larly dialogue, a technique with which it is included in some hand-
books 5. In this light, prosopopoiia can be regarded in more general
terms as the creation of appropriate speech for a person or object
which is germane to the occasion on which the speech is given and the
work in which it is relayed. By adding speech to their works, authors
contributed to the believability of their characters and events depicted
while adding persuasive power by appealing to their audience’s emo-
3
Cicero’s personification in his defense of Marcus Caelio is a classic
example of prosopopoiia in a courtroom. In his defense, Cicero impersona-
tes Appius Claudius, a famous ancestor of Caelio’s old mistress and accuser,
Clodia, to shame her character (Cael. 14). He then impersonates her brother,
Clodius, who encouraged her pursuit of vice elsewhere (Cael. 15; cf. Quin-
tilian, Inst. Or. 3.8.54). Cicero’s technique successfully shifted the court’s
focus from the charges brought against Caelio to the questionable reputation
of Clodia. See also Plato’s use of prosopopoetics to give voice to those ex-
pressing different points of view in his dialogues (cf. Rep. 365c-367a; 455a-
c), especially Socrates’ personification of “the Laws†in the Crito (50d-54d).
4
This term is used with permission from C.A. GIBSON, “Prosopopoeia in the
New Testament: Where Should We Look, and What Should We Expect to Find?â€
(Paper presented at the annual meeting of the SBL, Philadelphia, PA 2005).
5
Theon, Prog. 68; Quintilian, Inst. Or. 9.2.31-37; Ps.-Cicero, Rhet. Her.
4.51.65-53.66.