Alicia D. Myers, «Prosopopoetics and Conflict: Speech and Expectations in John 8», Vol. 92 (2011) 580-596
This article explores the conflict of John 8 within the larger context of the Gospel and in the light of the ancient rhetorical practice of prosopopoiia: the creation of speech for characters. These speeches add to the credibility of a narrative by being «appropriate» for both the person speaking and the situation in which the speech is given. Although perhaps not prosopopoiia in the traditional sense of speeches from Greek histories, this essay argues that the Gospel nevertheless includes prosopopoetics by creating appropriate, albeit unnerving, words for Jesus that elevate the audience and add to the persuasiveness of the work.
Biblica_1_Layout 1 20/01/12 11:44 Pagina 592
592 ALICIA D. MYERS
8,31-59 respond to Jesus according to these specifications, with the re-
sult that they are baffled and offended by his words.
Indeed, in spite of Jesus’s instruction in 7,24, it seems nearly —
if not completely — impossible for characters within the text to
react to Jesus other than by his appearance, especially since his
words are so inappropriate in comparison to it. By the guidelines of
prosopopoiia mentioned above, Jesus undermines his own credi-
bility for these characters with his speeches, and even those re-
ported to “believe†are not trusted or can turn against him (2,23-25;
6,60-66; 8,31-59). Indeed, only those given special revelations of
Jesus’ identity (such as John the Baptist), or are specifically chosen
by God (the Twelve, or the blind man), seem to persevere with their
faith in spite of the confusion caused by Jesus’ words.
Yet, while Jesus’ words repeatedly fail to persuade characters
within the Gospel, they are a key component to the believability of his
character for those listening to the Gospel as a whole. This is because
the Gospel writer is not concerned to encourage belief in Jesus among
those in the past, but rather among those listening to his Gospel in the
present (and arguably, the future). As a result, it is the Gospel audi-
ence’s determination of the appropriateness of Jesus’ words that mat-
ters, not the decision of the characters in the text. The Gospel writer’s
focus on his audience leads him to elevate their perspective while
downplaying that of other characters within the Gospel.
Unable to see Jesus, the audience of John’s Gospel is arguably
at a disadvantage in determining his identity. The Gospel writer,
however, turns such a disadvantage upside-down by providing his
audience with information about Jesus that is unknowable to those
with whom Jesus interacts in the text. As is commonly noted by
scholars, John’s Gospel includes a number of clues for its audience
in the form of narrative asides unavailable to characters within the
narrative’s story world 35. Moreover, the Gospel audience benefits
it creates “contempt for the profession†lays the “foundations of impudenceâ€,
and causes “confidence to outstrip capacity†(Inst. Or. 12.6.2-3 [RUSSELL,
LCL]), while those too old lose the dignity they worked so hard to earn.
35
Cf. M.C. TENNEY, “The Footnotes in John’s Gospelâ€, BSac 117 (1960)
350-364; J.J. O’ROURKE, “Asides in the Gospel of Johnâ€, NT 21 (1979) 210-
219; G. VAN BELLE, Les parenthèses dans l’évangile de Jean: Aperçu historique
et classification; texte grec de Jean (Studiorum Novi Testamenti Auxilia 11;
Leuven 1985); F. NEIRYNCK, “Parentheses in the Fourth Gospelâ€, ETL 65 (1989)
119-123; CULPEPPER, Anatomy, 17-18.