Mark Jennings, «The Fourth Gospel’s Reversal of Mark in John 13,31‒14,3», Vol. 94 (2013) 210-236
I argue that the author/s of the Fourth Gospel knew Mark, based on the reversal of certain Markan themes found in John. No attempt is made here to suggest the kind of literary dependence which is the basis of the Synoptic problem. Rather, my thesis is that the author/s of John may have used Mark from memory, writing deliberately to reverse the apocalyptic tendencies found in the Second Gospel. Isolated incidents of this possible reversal demonstrate little, but this paper proposes that the cumulative force of many such reversals supports the thesis of John's possible knowledge of Mark.
228 MARK JENNINGS
disciples. This statement functions as an answer to Peter’s question,
“Where are you going?†in 13,36a, as well as indicating that the de-
parture is in the disciples’ interest 66.
The term “my Father’s house†poses some interesting questions.
The simplest explanation is that the phrase refers to “heaven†67,
where the redeemed dwell together with God after death. Beasley-
Murray settles on this meaning, qualifying that for John the meaning
is wholly “unapocalyptic†(as such images are developed in Rev
21,9–22,5), but rather eschatological 68. “My Father’s houseâ€, then,
would refer to where Jesus is returning — to the glory he shared with
his Father before creation (17,5). This is also the final destination of
the disciples.
There is also precedent in the Fourth Gospel for associating the
phrase τῇ οἰκίᾳ τοῦ πατÏός with the temple 69. In the cleansing of the
temple in 2,16, Jesus orders those selling doves out, saying µὴ ποιεῖτε
τὸν οἶκον τοῦ πατÏός µου οἶκον á¼ÂµÏ€Î¿Ïίου. Further, John alerts the
reader that the temple destruction sayings in 2,19-22 were actually
references to Jesus’ own death 70. By using the phrase in 14,2 the
evangelist gives it an expanded meaning: the earthly temple built by
Herod and destroyed in 70 CE, points to the union of Jesus and his
followers together with the Father forever in the afterlife. This will
be made possible because of Jesus’ fulfilled mission of revealing the
Father’s glory 71.
Having departed in order to prepare a place for his followers in
heaven, he will return in order to take them to himself. This is a theme
so little mentioned in the Fourth Gospel that it seems almost out of
character with the rest of the discourse. Beutler argues that 14,2 pre-
sents John’s eschatological reinterpretation of the earthly sanctuary
in Jerusalem of Psalms 42/43, arguing that John’s contemporaries
SEGOVIA, Farewell, 83.
66
CARSON, John, 489; L. MORRIS, The Gospel According to John (Grand
67
Rapids, MI 1995) 567.
BEASLEY-MURRAY, John, 249.
68
KEENER, John, 932.
69
BEASLEY-MURRAY, John, 41; MOLONEY, Glory not Dishonor, 34. See
70
also KELLY – MOLONEY, Experiencing God, 288.
Similarly, the Johannine Jesus makes it clear in his conversation with
71
the Samaritan woman (4,21-24) that worship of God is not confined to a par-
ticular location (i.e. the temple in Jerusalem), but exists outside the realm of
space in the realm of spirit.
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2013 - Tutti i diritti riservati