Paul Danove 74 To these must be added the previously noted example, Col 1:23, whose object, a relative pronoun, appears in the genitive case through attraction to the case of its antecedent. The remaining 307 accusative objects and three dative objects, which arise through the attraction of relatives to the case of their antecedents, are characterized by the feature [+ response] 22. The presence of uses of akouw characterized by the features [+ response, – speaker] with objects jv in both the genitive and accusative indicates that a one-to-one correspon- dence between feature and object case is not possible. This is apparent in comparisons of minimally paired verb phrases characterized by the fea- tures [+ response, – speaker]: 22 Object noun phrase [+ response, – speaker] (accusative, direct): Gen 3:8 [A], 10 [A]; 11:7; 24:30; 27:34; 29:13; 31:1; 39:19; Exod 32:17 [A], 18; 33:4; 41:15; Lev 5:1; Num 14:27; Deut 1:17 [A, R], 34; 2:25; 4:10, 36; 5:1, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28a, 28b; 7:12; 11:13 [A, R], 22, 28; 18:16; 29:18; Josh 3:9; 6:20; 9:3, 9; 14:12; 22:2, 30; 24:27; Judg 3:4; 7:15; 9:30; 14:13; 1 Sam 2:24; 4:6 [A], 14, 19; 8:21; 9:27; 11:6; 17:11; 25:24; 26:19; 2 Sam 5:24; 7:22; 14:17; 15:10, 35, 36; 20:17; 1 Kgs 1:41, 45; 2:41 [A]; 14:6; 2 Kgs 6:30; 7:1; 11:13; 19:4, 6, 7, 11, 16; 20:16; 22:11, 18; 1 Chr 10:11; 14:15; 2 Chr 9:5; 15:8; 18:18; 23:12; 24:19 [A, R]; 34:26, 27; 1 Esdr 8:68; 2 Esdr 9:3; 11:4, 6; 14:14; 15:6; 18:9; 19:9; 23:3; Esth 1:1n; 4:4; Jdt 7:9; 8:9a, 9b; 10:14; 13:12; 14:7, 19; Tob 3:6, 10a, 10b [S]; 6:19; 7:10 [S]; 1 Macc 2:22; 3:27, 41; 4:27 [A]; 5:16; 6:8; 10:46; 3 Macc 5:35, 48; 4 Macc 8:15; 9:27; 10:17; 14:9a, 9b; Ps 25:7; 30:14; 48:2; 77:3; 101:21; 137:1, 4; Prov 1:8; 4:1; 5:13; 8:33; 19:20; 22:17; Job 13:6, 17b; 16:2; 20:3; 26:14; 32:11 [V]; 33:1; 34:16, 34; 37:4; 39:7; 40:4; 42:11; Wis 18:1; Sir 19:10; 21:15; 23:7; 29:25; 48:7; Hos 5:1; Amos 4:1; 5:1, 23; 7:16; 8:11; Mic 6:1; Nah 3:19; Zech 8:9; Isa 1:10; 24:16; 28:14; 30:21; 32:9; 36:13; 37:4, 7; 39:5; 47:8; 48:6; 66:5; Jer 4:19, 21; 5:21; 6:10 [A, S], 24 ; 7:2; 9:19; 10:1; 17:20; 18:2, 10 [A]; 19:3; 20:10; 21:11; 22:2, 29; 27:43; 28:51; 30:14, 29; 31:5; 33:10, 12, 21; 35:7; 37:5; 38:10, 18; 41:4; 42:18; 43:11, 13, 16, 24; 44:2, 5; 45:1, 20; 49:6, 15; 51:24, 26; Bar 3:9; Lam 1:21; 3:56, 61; Ezek 3:6, 17; 13:2; 16:35; 25:3; 33:4, 5, 7, 30, 31, 32; 37:4; 44:5; Sus 26; Dan 4:9, 28, 31 [Sy]; 6:15; 8:16; 10:9; Matt 7:24, 26; 10:27; 11:4; 13:19, 20, 23; 14:1; 15:12; 19:22; 21:45; 26:65; Mark 4:16, 20, 24; Luke 1:41; 2:20b (dative); 4:23b, 28; 8:15, 21; 9:7, 9; 11:28; 14:15; 16:14; 18:23; John 3:8, 32b; 5:24, 37; 8:26, 38b, 40b; 9:40; 15:15b; 16:13b; 19:8; Acts 1:4; 4:4, 20; 5:5a, 24; 7:54; 9:4; 10:44; 15:7; 17:8; 21:12; 22:14; 26:14; 2 Cor 12:4; Eph 1:13; Phil 4:9; 2 Tim 2:2; 1 John 1:1, 3, 5; 2:24b; 3:11; Rev 1:3, 10; 4:1; 6:7; 9:16; 10:4, 8; 22:18. These observations assume a continuity in the referents of subjects even though the explicitly stated subject changes in some cases: 2 Sam 7:22 («we» to «they»); Sir 23:7 («you [pl.]» to «he»); Isa 24:16 («we» to «they»); 30:22 («your [s.] hands» to «you [s.]»; Jer 6:24 («we» to «our hands»); 27:43 («you [s.]» to «your [s.] hands»); 45:20 («you [s.]» to «your [s.] hands»); Bar 3:9 («Israel» to «you [pl.]»); 1 John 3:11 («you [pl.]» to «we»). They also include examples in which the notice of the response precedes that of the hearing: 2 Sam 15:36b [15:36a]; 1 Kgs 1:45 [1:41]; 2 Kgs 19:20b [19:20a]; Ps 137:4b [137:4a]; Jer 28:51b [28:51a]; 43:13b [43:13a]; 43:24b [43:24a]; Luke 2:20b [2:20a]; 4:23b [4:23a]; John 3:32b [3:32a]; 8:38b [8:38a]; 8:40b [8:40a]; 15:15b [15:15a]; 16:13b [16:13a]. In Amos 8:11 [8:12], the permissibly omitted subject of an infinitive relates the response to the hearing. Finally, in Ps 137:1 [137:4] the notice of the response is separated from the notice of the hearing by an intervening verb which relates activity prior to the hearing.