James Swetnam, «The Context Of The Crux At Hebrews 5,7-8», Vol. 14 (2001) 101-120
An article in Biblica
by the present author outlined a proposed solution for the crux at Heb
5,7-8. The present article will attempt to put this proposed solution
in the general and particular context of the structure of the first six
chapters of the epistle. This contextualization should help indicate the
intention of the author of Hebrews and thus clarify and further commend
the proposed solution. The structure on which this contextualization is
based is, like the solution to the crux at Heb 5,7-8, a suggestion, to be
judged on the intrinsic merits or lack thereof of the arguments adduced.
James Swetnam
120
math of the sacrifice of Isaac. Thus the high priesthood of Christ in 4,13
– 6,20, since it is interpreted in Hebrews as being prefigured by the high
priesthood of Melchizedek as presented in 7,1-28 as introduced by 6,9-
20, should be seen as the vehicle of transmitting the Christianized prom-
ise of progeny to Abraham by God. This progeny, like Melchizedek and
hence like Christ, is viewed as being ‘without (human) father or mother,
without genealogy, without beginning of days nor end of life’ (7,3).
Thus the key elements for understanding the background of the crux
at Heb 5,7-8 are Jesus as lovgo~ in 5,13 and Jesus as prefigured by
Melchizedek. That is to say, the crux at Heb 5,7-8, with its emphasis on
Christ’s free sacrifice of Himself and the relation of this sacrifice to the
Christian tôdâ, is intimately connected with the promise of God to
Abraham of Progeny following the sacrifice of Isaac. But in Hebrews, this
progeny is brought to a spiritualized, Christianized fulfillment transcend-
ing the promise of physical Progeny as the original promise in Gen 22 is
usually understood.
James SWETNAM
Pontifical Biblical Institute
Piazza della Pilotta, 25
00187 Rome (ITALY)