Andrew M. Bowden, «The Fruit of Righteousness in James: A Study in Discourse Analysis.», Vol. 26 (2013) 87-108
In this study, a discourse analysis of James is conducted with the goal of better understanding the structure, theme, and cohesion of the letter. By paying careful attention to the details of the text, James’ paragraphs are identified, as are the signals of transition between the various paragraphs. The conclusions reached based on a discourse analysis of James are illuminating. Far from being a randomly arranged work, James repeatedly uses present prohibitory imperatives in the overall organization of the Epistle. These imperatives are important in marking transitions between main sections. Furthermore, a discourse analysis reveals that James is a coherent epistle comprised of 16 paragraphs, with 3,13-18 providing the overarching macrostructure of the letter. Bearing the fruit of righteousness, a theme prominent in 3,13-18, is seen to be the letter’s overarching and unifying thought.
The Fruit of Righteousness in James: A Study in Discourse Analysis 93
they test faith, revealing those areas that are lacking (in the fruit of
righteousness). This enables believers to become τέλειοι, since God is
glad to supply whatever is revealed to be lacking. Receiving an answer to
this prayer does not depend on worldly status (vv. 9-11), for the worldly
wealthy are often the ones who wither away while the poor endure
temptation and receive the victor’s crown from God (vv. 9-12).
Such an introductory thought introduces several key issues that will
be unfolded during the course of the letter. The mention of temptation
prepares for the more lengthy discussions regarding specific temptations
being faced by the readers, such as favoritism (2,1-12), faith without
deeds (2,14-26), the tongue (3,1-12), friendship with the world (4,1-10),
and arrogant planning (4,13 – 5,6). In these discussions James will seek
to identify specific areas where the temptations have revealed lack. Thus,
James has structured the opening paragraph of his Epistle in a way that
prepares his audience to examine themselves and see in what areas they
may be lacking. When areas of lack have been exposed, the readers ought
to focus their attention on the increasing wholeness that comes from God
in the form of wisdom.
Thus, the main thought of the Epistle (which will be examined in 3,13-
18) is introduced immediately in the first paragraph. Wisdom comes
from God and is the answer for deficiencies of faith. Another important
theme introduced in this first paragraph is the notion of eschatological
reward (1,12). Penner has convincingly demonstrated that eschatology
plays a prominent role in James26. The theme relates closely to the idea of
bearing the fruit of righteousness because those who fail to do so should
expect judgment (note the letter’s many references to κρίσις), while those
who are complete can expect sure reward.
2.2.1.2 Birthed as God’s Firstfruits (1,13-18)
This second paragraph of the body’s introduction is marked by the
imperative λεγέτω, which indicates a transition from the indicative of
the previous verse to a fresh hortatory section. The paragraph continues
through v. 18, where the imperative and vocative in v. 19 mark the next
paragraph. Parallelism within vv. 13-18 also shows that these verses are
a cohesive paragraph. The imperative λεγέτω in v. 13 is balanced by the
imperative πλανᾶσθε in v. 16. In v. 13, James refutes the charge that
temptation comes ἀπὸ θεός, while in v. 16 he reminds the reader that all
goodness comes ἀπὸ πατρός. In v. 15, temptation births death (ἀποκύει
θάνατον), while in v. 18 God births children into fruit-bearing creatures
(ἀπεκύησεν … ἀπαρχήν … κτισμάτων).
26
Penner, James and Eschatology.