John P. Meier, «The Historical Jesus and the Historical Samaritans: What can be Said?», Vol. 81 (2000) 202-232
Careful analysis of the Gospels shows that there is not very much hard data about the historical Jesus interaction with or views about the Samaritans. There is multiple attestation, found in the Lucan and Johannine traditions, that Jesus, different from typical views of his time, held a benign view of Samaritans and had positive, though passing, encounters with some Samaritans. However, there is gospel agreement, from silence or statement, that Jesus had no programmatic mission to the Samaritans. Besides the above important conclusions, this essay also makes clear the useful distinction between Samaritans and Samarians.
rapprochements. But one must ask whether the very concept of
schism is appropriate here. Schism presupposes some original unity
or union. If we are speaking of Samaritans and Jews, we must ask in what sense
these two groups were ever united. This question in turn brings us back to our initial
problem of terminology and definitions. Jews ('Ioudai=oi
in Greek, yehûdîm in Hebrew, yehu=da4)|
Perhaps, then, a better way of conceiving of the state of affairs around the turn of the era is to maintain that both Samaritanism and Judaism were latter-day forms of the ancient religion of Israel, a Palestinian religion that believed in and worshiped the God YHWH as