Francesca Stavrakopoulou, «Exploring the Garden of Uzza: Death, Burial and Ideologies of Kingship», Vol. 87 (2006) 1-21
The Garden of Uzza (2 Kgs 21,18.26) is commonly regarded as a pleasure garden
in or near Jerusalem which came to be used as a royal burial ground once the tombs
in the City of David had become full. However, in this article it is argued that the
religious and cultic significance of royal garden burials has been widely
overlooked. In drawing upon comparative evidence from the ancient Near East, it
is proposed that mortuary gardens played an ideological role within perceptions of
Judahite kingship. Biblical texts such as Isa 65,3-4; 66,17 and perhaps 1,29-30 refer
not to goddess worship, but to practices and sacred sites devoted to the royal dead.
Exploring the Garden of Uzza 3
burial “in the garden of his house in the Garden of Uzza†in 2 Kgs
21,18 functions as a part of the biblical writer’s damning judgement of
Manasseh, signalling the king’s post-mortem displacement from his
ancestral line (7). Moreover, it is clear that the ideological importance
of royal burials was also perceived by other tradents of the biblical
traditions. As many commentators have observed, the Chronicler
appears to tailor his burial notices to suit his theological appraisal of
each monarch (8). Thus the non-specification of a burial place for the
favoured king Hezekiah in 2 Kgs 20,21 is remedied in 2 Chr 32,33
with a detailed description of Hezekiah’s honourable burial alongside
his Davidic ancestors. In view of this theological tendency, it is notable
that the Chronicler’s rehabilitated Manasseh is not given a garden
burial, but is simply buried wtyb, “in his house†(33,20), whilst the
burial of the unrepentant Amon is not even mentioned (33,25).
Similarly, the absence of a burial notice for Jehoiakim in 2 Kgs
24,6 appears to be rectified in a tradition reflected in Greek versions
of the biblical regnal accounts, in which it is claimed that the sinful
king Jehoiakim was buried in the khpw Oza, “Garden of Oza†(4
Kgdms Lucianic 24,6) or a place named Γανοζα, “Ganoza†(2 Par
36,8); the former appears to be a translation and the latter a
transliteration of the designation az[ ˆg, “Garden of Uzzaâ€. This
tradition concerning Jehoiakim’s burial may have arisen in direct
response to the claim reflected in MT 2 Kgs 24,6 that he “slept with
his ancestorsâ€, a formulaic expression argued by many to refer to
actual burial in an ancestral tomb or grave (9), and perhaps here taken
to indicate the royal burial place last specified in the books of Kings,
the Garden of Uzza. However, it is equally likely that the tradition
locating Jehoiakim’s burial in the Garden of Uzza alongside the
reprobates Manasseh and Amon served to compound his villainous
biblical portrayal in assigning him a disreputable grave away from
(7) F. STAVRAKOPOULOU, King Manasseh and Child Sacrifice. Biblical
Distortions of Historical Realities (BZAW 338; Berlin – New York 2004) 44-45.
(8) E.g., E. BLOCH-SMITH, Judahite Burial Practices and Beliefs about the
Dead (JSOT/ASORMS 7/JSOTSS 123; Sheffield 1992) 118-119; H.G.M.
WILLIAMSON, 1 & 2 Chronicles (NCB; London 1982) 388.
(9) E.g., G.R. DRIVER, “Plurisma Mortis Imageâ€, Studies and Essays in Honor
of Abraham A. Neuman (eds. M. BEN-HORIN – B.D. WEINRYB – S. ZEITLIN)
(Leiden 1962) 128-143, esp. 141; BLOCH-SMITH, Judahite Burial Practices, 110;
cf. L. WÄCHTER, Der Tod im Alten Testament (Arbeiten zur Theologie II/8;
Stuttgart 1967) 71-72; ILLMAN, Old Testament Formulas, 44-47.