Elie Assis, «Haggai: Structure and Meaning», Vol. 87 (2006) 531-541
This article uncovers a sophisticated structure of the Book of Haggai and its
significance. The structure of the book is part of the rhetoric of the prophet to
contend with the people’s thoughts that reality did not meet their hopes. They
expected in vain the renewal of the ‘old days’ to be immediate. Therefore, they
believed that God was not with them and felt they were still rejected by Him.
Haggai argues to the contrary: God was with them despite the seemingly
desperate situation, and the anticipated reality was bound to materialize, but only
gradually. The Book’s structure also shows that it is not a random collection of
oracles but one unified literary work.
Haggai: Structure and Meaning 533
part(10). This division is also supported by the fact that the concluding formula
“says the LORD of hosts†ends the second and the fourth oracles only; in the
first and the third there is no closing formula.
These findings establish the division of the four oracles into two parts: at
the beginning of the first part there is a full date indicating the start of the two
oracles that end with the closing “says the LORD of hosts†at the end of the
second oracle. The third oracle starts again with a full date to indicate the start
of a new part, and the fourth oracle ends with the formula “says the LORD of
hosts†as in the conclusion of the first part.
After establishing the two parts of the book, each made up of two oracles,
we find that there is a close connection between the first elements of the two
parts, i.e. the first and the third oracles, and between the second elements in
each part, i.e. the second and the fourth oracles (11).
3. The First and the Third Oracles
In both these oracles the prophet makes allegations against “this peopleâ€
(1,2; 2,14). This expression does not appear in the other two oracles (12).
In both oracles the situation depicted is of economic distress, which is
described similarly. The two oracles present two different aspects of the
economic distress. Severe natural disasters cause extensive damage to the
agricultural produce. The first oracle speaks of drought, 1,10-11, and in third
the disasters are blight, mildew and hail: 2,17.19.
In both oracles there is an additional economic difficulty: the people work
hard but for little yield, 1,6; 2,15. Both descriptions relate also to an emotional
disappointment in light of the small crop as against the high expectations.
In both oracles the explanation of the difficult economic situation is the
destruction of the Temple, and the people’s failure to rebuild it, and in both
the prophet maintains that with the construction of the Temple the economic
problem will be solved, 1,4.8-11. In the third oracle the prophet declares that
on the day of laying of the Temple’s foundation, the economic problem will
improve, 2,18-19.
In both oracles Haggai demands that the people consider their actions
well and mend their ways. Both use the expression: µkykrd l[ µkbbl wmyç (1,5,
7) µkbbl an wmyç (2,15,18). This expression with its variations appears in the
(10) Many scholars think that 15b is actually the introduction to 2:1-9, see e.g.: BHS;
MITCHELL, Haggai, 58; H.W. WOLFF, Haggai. A Commentary (Minneapolis 1988) 59;
Verhoef proposed that this verse functions in a double role, it concludes the preceding
oracle, but also is part of the introduction to the next one. See: VERHOEF, “Notes on the
Dates in the Book of Haggaiâ€, 262. However, the structure of the Book proves that indeed
it is intentional that the first and third oracles only have a full date, while the second and the
fourth have a short version of the date.
(11) See also: B. CHILDS, Introduction to the Old Testament as Scripture (Philadelphia
1979) 469-470; KESSLER, The Book of Haggai, 250-251, who both speak of a ABAB
structure.
(12) Townsend has noticed some of the connections between 1,1-11 and 2,10-19, and
demonstrated a similar structure of these oracles. See: T.N. TOWNSEND, “Additional
Comments on Haggai II 10-19â€, VT 18 (1968) 559-560. Some have noticed a few
connections between the first oracle and 2,15-19. But this was used to sustain the opinion
that the later unit should be replaced after 1,15a. See Wolff, Haggai, 60.