Wim J.C. Weren, «The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel: A New Proposal», Vol. 87 (2006) 171-200
The weakness of the proposals concerning the macrostructure of Matthew’s
Gospel made by Bacon and Kingsbury is that they depart from rigid caesuras,
whilst a typical characteristic of the composition of this Gospel is the relatively
smooth flow of the story. On the basis of the discovery that the various
topographical data are clustered together by means of three refrains we can
distinguish three patterns in the travels undertaken by Jesus. This rather coarse
structure is further refined with the use of Matera’s and Carter’s distinction
between kernels and satellites. Kernels are better labelled as “hinge texts”. The
following pericopes belong to this category: 4,12-17; 11,2-30; 16,13-28; 21,1-17;
26,1-16. Each of them marks a turning point in the plot and has a double function:
a hinge text is not only fleshed out in the subsequent pericopes but also refers to
the preceding block. It is especially these “hinge texts” that underline the
continuity of Matthew’s narrative and should prevent us from focussing too much
on alleged caesuras.
The Macrostructure of Matthew’s Gospel 187
taken in the kernel. Because these events (“minor eventsâ€) do not
themselves offer new moments of choice, but instead elaborate on the
one already made, they are not entirely indispensable. They do,
however, fill the void between one kernel and the next.
Matera uses these theoretical distinctions to find an answer to three
questions: a) What is the plot in Matthew?; b) Where are the “kernelsâ€
within the plot of Matthew’s Gospel?; c) What kind of narrative blocks
does Matthew consist of?
In answering the first question, Matera assumes that the salvation
history is the most central notion in Matthew. After all, the book does
extend all the way from Abraham (1,1) to the end of the age (28,20).
Within this huge framework, it describes how Jesus, on the one hand,
is (or: was) united with the people of Israel and, on the other, how he
increasingly becomes accepted by gentiles.
Matera sums up six passages in which there is a decisive turning
point: 2,1a: the birth of Jesus; 4,12-17: the beginning of Jesus’
ministry; 11,2-6: John’s question; 16,13-28: the conversation in the
district of Caesarea Philippi; 21,1-17: the cleansing of the temple;
28,16-20: the sending out of the disciples.
The first five kernels are accompanied by a number of satellites,
together with which they form a narrative block; in the case of the last
kernel, such satellites are absent:
“Kernelsâ€: Narrative blocks: Description:
2,1a 1. 1,1–4,11 The coming of the Messiah
4,12-17 2. 4,12–11,1 The Messiah’s ministry to Israel of preaching,
teaching, and healing
11,2-6 3. 11,2–16,12 The crisis in the Messiah’s ministry
16,13-28 4. 16,13–20,34 The Messiah’s journey to Jerusalem
21,1-17 5. 21,1–28,15 The Messiah’s death and resurrection
28,16-20 6. 28,16-20 The great commission
An adapted form of Matera’s hypothesis has been adopted by W.
Carter (28). The following scheme shows what the modified plan of
Matthew’s Gospel looks like.
“Kernelsâ€: Narrative blocks: Description:
1,18-25 1. 1,1–4,16 God is the origin of Jesus
4,17-25 2. 4,17–11,1 Jesus manifests God’s saving presence in his
preaching and healing
(28) W. CARTER, “Kernels and Narrative Blocks: The Structure of Matthew’s
Gospelâ€, CBQ 54 (1992) 463-481. See also: ID., Matthew: Storyteller, Interpreter,
Evangelist (Peabody, MA 1996) 159-175.