Lena-Sofia Tiemeyer, «The Question of Indirect Touch: Lam 4,14; Ezek 44,19 and Hag 2,12-13», Vol. 87 (2006) 64-74
This article compares Lam 4,14; Ezek 44,19 and Hag 2,12-13 with regard to the
transference of impurity and holiness via indirect touch. Lam 4,14 forms an apt
parallel to Hag 2,13 in that both texts claim that impurity can be transmitted via
indirect touch. In contrast, Ezek 44,19 contradicts Hag 2,12 concerning the
transmission of holiness. The discussion focuses mainly on the translation of Lam
4,14, with specific attention to the interpretation of the verb l)g, the uses of the
root #dq in Hag 2,12 and Ezek 44,19, and finally considers whether or not Ezek
44,19 refers to indirect touch.
74 Lena-Sofia Tiemeyer
critical appraisal of the clergy as attested in Lamentations whilst remaining
unaware of the alternative, more favourable appraisal in Ezekiel.
University of Aberdeen Lena-Sofia TIEMEYER
School of Divinity – King’s College
Aberdeen AB24 3FX – UK
SUMMARY
This article compares Lam 4,14; Ezek 44,19 and Hag 2,12-13 with regard to the
transference of impurity and holiness via indirect touch. Lam 4,14 forms an apt
parallel to Hag 2,13 in that both texts claim that impurity can be transmitted via
indirect touch. In contrast, Ezek 44,19 contradicts Hag 2,12 concerning the
transmission of holiness. The discussion focuses mainly on the translation of Lam
4,14, with specific attention to the interpretation of the verb lag, the uses of the
root çdq in Hag 2,12 and Ezek 44,19, and finally considers whether or not Ezek
44,19 refers to indirect touch.