Chris Keith, «'In My Own Hand': Grapho-Literacy and the Apostle Paul», Vol. 89 (2008) 39-58
Recent research in the school papyri of Egypt, especially Oxyrhychus, has illuminated our understanding of the pedagogical process in the Greco-Roman world. Particularly interesting in this respect is the acquisition and social function of grapho-literacy (i.e., the ability to compose writing). Since few were literate, and of those few, fewer could read than could write, understanding how one gained grapho-literacy, who gained grapho-literacy, and how that literacy was employed in day to day life shines new light on passages such as 1 Cor 16,21, Gal 6,11, Col 4,18, 2 Thess 3,17, and Phlm 19. In these passages, Paul draws attention
to the fact that he has personally written in the text. This paper will argue that these passages are not merely interesting asides, but rather significantly heighten the
rhetorical force of the text. They draw attention not only to Paul’s grapho-literacy, but also to his ability to avoid using it.
54 Chris Keith
and “slow writers†does not prove that Paul’s letters were likewise
unskilled, it does call into question the current robust rejection of
Deissmann’s suggestion about Paul’s “big lettersâ€. For the present
study, however, the critical point is that, whether or not Paul’s writing
is less than calligraphic, it is his.
In this sense, Cribiore’s observation equally illuminates the other
four Pauline passages as well, as it draws attention to the importance,
in the ancient world, of demonstrating the literate ability one
possessed. If an individual could do nothing more than sign his name,
he could locate himself within that minority of the society that was
educated, even if he was clearly not as educated as others. That is, it
was better to be on the bottom rung of the literacy ladder (and prove it)
than it was not to be on the literacy ladder at all (and prove that). When
Paul mentions that he writes with his own hand, therefore, he was not
only pointing out how important a particular point or section of the
epistle was to him. Though he may have been doing that amongst other
things (and likely was), he was simultaneously making a point about
himself — proving to the church he is addressing that he is an educated
member of society. This was an important point to make, and
especially when issues of textual interpretation were at stake and “the
bulk of the membership [of Paul’s churches] was nonelite [i.e.,
illiterate], as 1 Cor 1,26 indicates†(69). Drawing attention to his
educated status, however, was perhaps not the only rhetorical function
of proving his grapho-literacy.
Literacy intertwined with status in a multifaceted manner in the
ancient world. One aspect of this complex relationship concerns
displays of grapho-literacy such as Paul’s. For persons of prestige, one
mark of status was the ability to demonstrate literacy but
simultaneously avoid its use (70). “One might almost say that there was
a direct correlation between the social standing that guaranteed literacy
and the means to avoid writing†(71). (A rough modern analogy to this
phenomenon would be the manner in which the über-rich may employ
chauffeurs — they could drive themselves, but their ability to pay
(69) J.S. KLOPPENBORG VERBIN, Excavating Q. The History and Setting of the
Sayings Gospel (Edinburgh 2000) 167.
(70) Likewise with reading. See ACHTEMEIER, “Omne verbum sonatâ€, 16, who
cites Pliny, Epistulae 3.5.15. In this passage, Pliny the Younger describes his
uncle Pliny the Elder as having a servant ready to read to him (or take dictation)
even while bathing.
(71) BAGNALL, Reading Papyri, 25.