Tova Ganzel, «The Defilement and Desecration of the Temple in Ezekiel», Vol. 89 (2008) 369-379
An examination of the passages in Ezekiel related to the 'defilement' and 'desecration' of the Temple through the spectrum of the Priestly Sources clearly shows a distinction between the two concepts and reveals Ezekiel’s precise and deliberate usage of these terms. Although they both relate to idolatrous practices, defilement of the Temple in Ezekiel follows the categories of the Priestly Sources, and thus results primarily from corpse impurity and idol worship. With regard to the Temple’s desecration, Ezekiel introduces the aspect of the intense involvement of foreigners, which he viewed as the desecrating agents of his day.
The Defilement and Desecration of the Temple in Ezekiel 379
When it comes to the Temple’s desecration, however, Ezekiel recognizes
a broader definition than that which is used in the Priestly Sources.
Desecration constitutes the absence of sanctity, rather than a particular status
that is assigned under specifically prescribed conditions. As such, the
phenomenon of desecration is far more flexible than defilement. Since it is
merely the absence of holiness, any instrument by which holiness is divested
from the Temple can be said to desecrate the Temple. Thus, even factors that
the Pentateuch does not associate with desecration may constitute agents of
desecration at a later period, if they have the effect of divesting the holy
precinct of its sanctity.
The flexibility of the concept of “desecration†enabled Ezekiel to
introduce factors more relevant to his own period, even though they are not
mentioned as “desecrating†factors in the Priestly Sources or elsewhere in the
Pentateuch. Thus, whereas in the Pentateuch the desecration of the temenos
results from the disruption of the sacred cult, in Ezekiel it usually ensues from
the entry of gentiles into the Temple, or of Israelites who have just sacrificed
their children to idols.
This conclusion sheds further light on the question of what sources were
available to Ezekiel when he wrote his book. Ezekiel was obviously familiar
with the Priestly Sources’ concepts of defilement and desecration of the
sacred precinct, and he simply utilized and adjusted these concepts in
accordance with his prophetic needs. There is also evidence for Ezekiel’s
familiarity with Deuteronomic terminology, as exemplified by his use of the
terms μyxwqyç and twb[wt; that, however, remains a topic for independent
consideration.
Bar-Ilan University Tova GANZEL
Israel
SUMMARY
An examination of the passages in Ezekiel related to the “defilement†and
“desecration†of the Temple through the spectrum of the Priestly Sources clearly
shows a distinction between the two concepts and reveals Ezekiel’s precise and
deliberate usage of these terms. Although they both relate to idolatrous practices,
defilement of the Temple in Ezekiel follows the categories of the Priestly Sources,
and thus results primarily from corpse impurity and idol worship. With regard to
the Temple’s desecration, Ezekiel introduces the aspect of the intense involvement
of foreigners, which he viewed as the desecrating agents of his day.