Gregory T.K. Wong, «Goliath's Death and the Testament of Judah», Vol. 91 (2010) 425-432
In a 1978 article, Deem proposed to read xcm in 1 Sam 17,49 as «greave» rather than «forehead». However, this reading has not gained wide acceptance partly because its lack of external support. This article explores the possibility that the description of a combat detail in the pseudepigraphal Testament of Judah may in fact be traceable to an understanding of 1 Sam 17,49 in line with Deem’s proposal. If so, this may constitute the very external support needed to lend further credibility to the reading championed by Deem.
429
GOLIATH’S DEATH TESTAMENT JUDAH
AND THE OF
to the greaves is found. A careful reading of the T Jud 3, however,
suggests that 1 Sam 17 continues to shape the narrative.
Putting aside for the moment the reference to the greaves, at least
three other similarities between the T Jud 3 and 1 Sam 17 can be
discerned. First, in T Jud 3,1, the two Canaanite kings are described as
coming sheathed in armour (teuwrakismenoi). This is reminiscent of the
Â¥
description of Goliath being clothed in a scaled armour (uwraka in the
Â¥
LXX) in 1 Sam 17,5. Second, in T Jud 3,6, when Judah is attacked by nine
of Achor’s men, he is said to have killed four of them by slinging stones
at them (lıuoiv sφendwnısav aytoyv). This seems to echo David’s
¥ ¥ ߥ
killing of Goliath in 1 Sam 17,49, when he slung (esφendonhsen in the
ß ¥
LXX) one stone (lıuon ena in the LXX) at him 19. Third, in T Jud 3,7,
Â¥ â„¢
Jacob is said to have killed Beelesah, king of all the kings, who is “twelve
cubits high (tq ısxyi phxwn i*b*)â€. This height specification in cubits is
˜ß ¥ ˜
reminiscent of Goliath, whose height is specified in the MT of 1 Sam 17,4
as “six cubits and a span (but ycov aytoy tessarwn phxewn kaı
™ ߘ ¥ ¥ ù
spiuamhv, according to the LXX)†20.
˜
What is most significant about these three similarities, however, is not
just that Greek terms similar to those found in the LXX of 1 Sam 17 are
used in the T Jud 3, but that at least two of the three cases seem to
represent unique contributions by the author of the Testament beyond
what is found in the underlying source material of the account. For
scholars of the Testament have long noticed that the account of Judah’s
war with the Amorites in T Jud 3–7 shares significant similarities with
some midrashic haggadic material 21. These include the 13th Century CE
Midrash Wayiss‘u found in the Yalkut Shimeoni and the 14th Century CE
Chronicles of Yerahmeel, both of which contain a more elaborate account
of the same war 22. The same stories are also found expanded and
This is also suggested by HOLLANDER – DE JONGE, Testament, 191, who
19
referenced T Jud 3,6 back to the David and Goliath story in 1 Sam 17,40.49.
Again, HOLLANDER – DE JONGE, Testament, 191, referenced T Jud 3,7 to
20
1 Sam 17,4 when they speak of Beelisah being regarded as “a super Goliathâ€.
S e e R.H. C H A R L E S , A p o c r y p h a and Pseudepigrapha of the Old
21
Testament in English. With Introductions and Critical and Explanatory Notes to
the Several Books (Oxford, 1913) II, 290; M. DE JONGE, The Testaments of the
Twelve Patriarchs. A Study of Their Text, Composition, and Origin (Assen
1975) 61; HOLLANDER – DE JONGE, Testament, 185-186.
According to HOLLANDER – DE JONGE, Testament, 26, the Chronicles of
22
Yerahmeel is considered a parallel text of Midrash Wayiss‘u, such that
Hollander and de Jonge actually include an excerpt of an English translation of
the Chronicles of Yerahmeel in their Appendix II, but title it Midrash Wayiss‘u.