Étienne Nodet, «On Jesus' Last Supper», Vol. 91 (2010) 348-369
In the Gospels, Jesus' last supper involves custom and legal issues: chronological discrepancies between the Synoptics and John, a mock trial before the Sanhedrin, two trials before Pilate (John), and so on. This study focuses on the calendar problem, a topic of utmost importance in ancient Judaism, and follows A. Jaubert's hypothesis, against J. Jeremias' now classical view: the Synoptics display a somewhat loose connection with the Jubilees sectarian calendar, while John's chronology seems to be historically more accurate.
369
ON JESUS’ LAST SUPPER
the trial before a powerless Sanhedrin in the middle of the feast;
the release of Barabbas after the Passover meal, whereas he should
have been able to take part in it (m.Pes 8 :6) ; Simon of Cyrene
returning from working in the fields during the feast (Luke 23,26),
and so on. The strange features of the Eucharistic institution have
been alluded to above 49. Prominent among them is the single cup
of wine for all, as this cannot be compared with the four cups
prescribed by Rabbinic tradition for the Passover meal (m.Pes
10 :1) : moreover, it is expounded (b.Pes 109a) that the festival was
to be celebrated by eating meat (Deut 12,18) when the Temple was
extant, but after its destruction wine was to be used instead (see
Judg 9,13).
In any case, the most ancient tradition is certainly the one
given in 1 Cor 11,23, where it is written: “The Lord Jesus, on the
night when he was deliveredâ€. The same wording is found in the
ancient canonical-liturgical texts (Apostolic Constitutions 8 :12 ;
Hippolytus of Rome, Apostolic Tradition, § 8). These texts are
remarkable for the fact that they do not mention Passover, neither
do they state that this occurred the day before his death. These
issues obviously require further studies.
École Biblique Étienne NODET
POB 19053
Jerusalem – IL
SUMMARY
In the Gospels, Jesus’ last supper involves custom and legal issues:
chronological discrepancies between the Synoptics and John, a mock trial
before the Sanhedrin, two trials before Pilate (John), and so on. This study
focuses on the calendar problem, a topic of utmost importance in ancient
Judaism, and follows A. Jaubert’s hypothesis, against J. Jeremias’ now
classical view: the Synoptics display a somewhat loose connection with the
Jubilees sectarian calendar, while John’s chronology seems to be historically
more accurate.
precedence of the Synoptics, have tended to use ad hoc arguments, and the
main result has been to underline the problems, see S. LÉGASSE, Le procès de
Jésus. La Passion dans les quatre évangiles (LD 3; Paris 1995).
See J. MANN, “Rabbinic Studies in the Synoptic Gospelsâ€, HUCA 1
49
(1924) 339-351.