Dominik Opatrny, «The Figure of a Blind Man in the Light of the Papyrological Evidence», Vol. 91 (2010) 583-594
This article presents the status of a blind man in ancient society. There are three characteristics often associated with blind persons in the Bible: anonymity, passivity and beggary. The aim of this study is to confront these characteristics with the evidence found in Greek papyri. The author discusses both similar and opposite cases and comes to a more detailed conclusion on the situation of these people.
593
THE FIGURE OF A BLIND MAN
fore it was possible for blind persons to perform manual work and
make a living by it 30.
* *
*
To summarize, the proposed characteristics of a blind person in
Antiquity — anonymity, passivity and beggary — turned out to be
often valid, but not always. In several cases blind people are men-
tioned without a name, even in lists of names. Such anonymity can
be associated with social exclusion (as was the anonymity of for-
eigners) because when a social group knows and uses the name of
an individual, it usually means that she or he is more or less inte-
grated. When a poor man or a foreigner lost his sight, he became
known just as “the blind manâ€. But the blind who owned property,
governed their own house (oıkov), which provided for them and by
®
which they continued their business, were known by name in their
neighbourhood.
We cannot expect to arrive at any knowledge about those blind
people who gave up an active attitude towards their lives. Nat-
urally, the documents rather concern those who were well-off or
who were economically active (yet even some of those are not
mentioned by name). Some of them were tax-exempt, but others
had to pay taxes, like anybody else. Those who owned consid-
erable fortune were able to dispose of it through their servants and
some of them could even manage their own house, which was
called by their name. The situation of those blind people who were
poor was worse, but there was still the possibility for them to per-
form simple manual work (maybe with the help of relatives or
friends). Definitely it is not true, that every blind man had to be a
beggar who sits for a whole day waiting for alms and nobody
know his name.
The available data about blind persons in Antiquity are scarce
and very diverse at the same time. Naturally it is not possible to
draw a universal picture of blind person in Antiquity. The aim of
As a less significant example we can see the man with weak eyes, who
30
though being exempted from digging is now forced to participate in this work
and therefore writes a letter of complaint (P. Mich. XI 618).