Joseph Blenkinsopp, «The Baal Peor Episode Revisited (Num 25,1-18)», Vol. 93 (2012) 86-97
The Baal Peor episode (Num 25,1-18), followed by the second census (Num 26), marks the break between the first compromised wilderness generation and the second. This episode is a «covenant of kinship» between Israelites and Midianites resident in Moab, sealed by marriage between high-status individuals from each of these lineages. The violent repudiation of this transaction by the Aaronid Phineas is in marked contrast to the Midianite marriage of Moses, for which an explanation is offered, and is paradigmatic of the attitude to intermarriage of the Aaronid priesthood during the mid-to-late-Achaemenid period.
91
THE BAAL PEOR EPISODE REVISITED
conflated with the Balaam narrative immediately preceding in which
Moabites and Midianites are closely associated (Num 22,4.7). The blow
struck by Phineas will have its sequel in the war of extermination against
the Midianites in which Phineas will again play a leading role. In the course
of that war Balaam will have to die for having advised the Midianite women
to seduce the Israelites into apostasy in the affair of Peor, the allusion of
course being to the first Baal Peor episode featuring Moabite women (Num
31,8.16)9. The Midianite-Moabite connection appears in other contexts. We
hear that the Edomite king Hadad defeated the Midianites in Moab (Gen
36,35), and the five Midianite “kings†killed in the war of extermination
were vassals of Sihon who reigned in Moab (Josh 13,21). Finally, the name
Zippor, belonging to the father of king Balak of Moab, is the masculine
counterpart to the name of Moses’ Midianite wife, Zipporah (Exod 2,21;
4,25; 18,2). The presence of Midianites in Moab evidenced in these biblical
texts is consistent with what is known about the extent of Midianite
expansion in the late second millennium B.C. By the Achaemenid period,
however, they were long gone from the scene, though still remembered,
their place having been taken first by the Ishmaelite tribal federation, later
still by the Kedarite Arabs who expanded into southern Palestine and the
Transjordanian plateau including land formerly part of the kingdom of
Moab. Under their leader Geshem (Gashm), they were one of several thorns
in Nehemiah’s side during his governorship (Neh 2,19; 6,1-2.16) 10.
III. Historical context
It is surprising that throughout the history of interpretation of the Baal
Peor episode little attention has been given to another Israelite-Midianite
marriage, that of Moses to Zipporah (Exod 2,21; 4,25; 18,2). The Moses saga
9
On the tainted reputation of Balaam, which continued into early Chris-
tian times (2 Pet 2,15; Jude 11; Rev 2,14), see J. VAN SETERS, “From Faith-
ful Prophet to Villain: Observations on the Tradition History of the Balaam
Storyâ€, A Biblical Itinerary. In Search of Method, Form and Content. Essays
in Honor of George W. Coats (ed. E.E. CARPENTER) (JSOTSS 240; Sheffield
1997) 126-132. Van Seters attributes the derogatory portrait of Balaam to the
P author and to xenophobia in Judah of the Persian period in general.
10
On the extent of Midianite expansion and the Midianite-Moab connection
see O. EISSFELDT, “Protektorat der Midianiter über ihre Nachbarn im letzten
Viertel des 2. Jahrtausends v. Chr.â€, JBL 87 (1968) 383-393; W.J. DUMBRELL,
“Midian: A Land or a League?â€, VT 25 (1975) 323-337; E.J. PAYNE, “The Mid-
ianite Arc in Joshua and Judgesâ€, Midian, Moab and Edom (eds. J.F.A. SAWYER
– D.J.A. CLINES) (JSOTSS 24; Sheffield 1983) 163-172; E.A. KNAUF, Midian.
Untersuchungen zur Geschichte Palästinas und Nordarabiens am Ende des 2.
Jahrtausends v. Chr. (Wiesbaden 1988) 162-164.