M. Rogland, «Heavenly Chariots and Earthly Rebellion in Zechariah 6», Vol. 95 (2014) 117-123
This article proposes that Zech 6,5 mhtxb al-adin cl-harez indicates that the heavenly chariots are sent forth in response to rebellion against the Lord. It argues that mn plus the infinitive has a causal force and that htxb al means 'to take a stand (in opposition or rebellion)' (cf. Ps 2,2) rather than 'to present oneself'. This rebellion is the antecedent of the pronominal suffix in v. 6's asr-bt, indicating the object against which the chariotry is going forth. Rather than being the narrative of a peaceful patrol, the vision indicates that God's emissaries are engaged in warfare.
07_Biblica_AN_Rogland_Layout 1 01/04/14 12:05 Pagina 123
123
HEAVENLY CHARIOTS AND EARTHLY REBELLION IN ZECHARIAH 6
exegetical analysis of the pericope: vv. 1-3 provide an initial description
of the going forth of the divine chariotry, and in v. 4 the prophet inquires
as to the meaning of what he has seen. In vv. 5-6 the messenger explains
that the chariot teams have gone forth in response to rebellion against the
Lord of all the earth and to oppose it, providing additional detail as to some
of their movements. Verse 7 resumes the visionary narrative (either by con-
tinuing the main story line or by providing a “flashbackâ€, if wacy ~ycmahw
is understood as a pluperfect) with a focus upon the strong/dappled horses.
In response to this activity, v. 8 makes the concluding assertion that the
Lord’s spirit/wrath has been given rest in the northland. Such a statement
indicates that, at the very least, the rebellion in the north has been quelled 26.
Far from being an account of a peaceful, uneventful patrol of the heavenly
emissaries, then, Zech 6,1-8 describes a military mission engaged in conflict
and warfare.
Erskine Theological Seminary Max ROGLAND
1500 Lady Street
Columbia, SC 29201 (USA)
SUMMARY
This article proposes that Zech 6,5 #rah-lk !wda-l[ bcythm indicates
that the heavenly chariots are sent forth in response to rebellion against the
Lord. It argues that !m plus the infinitive has a causal force and that l[ bcyth
means “to take a stand (in opposition or rebellion)†(cf. Ps 2,2) rather than
“to present oneselfâ€. This rebellion is the antecedent of the pronominal suffix
in v. 6’s Hb-rva, indicating the object against which the chariotry is going
forth. Rather than being the narrative of a peaceful patrol, the vision indicates
that God’s emissaries are engaged in warfare.
26
Compare 2,10-11 [ET: vv. 6-7] (cf. MEYERS – MEYERS, Haggai,
Zechariah 1–8, 324) and 5,5-11 (cf. WILLI-PLEIN, Haggai, Sacharja,
Maleachi, 115), which designate “the land of the north/Babylon†and “Shi-
nar†as the chief center of enmity towards God’s people and the place where
wickedness is imprisoned.