Nadav Sharon, «Herod's Age When Appointed Strategos of Galilee: Scribal Error or Literary Motif?», Vol. 95 (2014) 49-63
In Antiquities Josephus says that Herod was only fifteen-years-old when appointed strategos of Galilee in 47 BCE. This is often dismissed as scribal error and corrected to twenty-five, because it contradicts other Herodian biographical information. However, this unattested emendation does not fit the immediate context, whereas 'fifteen' does. This paper suggests that rather than a scribal error, this is a literary motif, presenting Herod as a particularly young military hero. The specific age of fifteen may have had a deeper intention, fictively linking Herod's birth to the year 63, the year of Augustus' birth and Pompey's conquest of the Temple.
03_Biblica_Sharon_Layout 1 01/04/14 11:46 Pagina 56
56 NADAV SHARON
a young military hero appears in Xenophon’s biography of Cyrus the
Great. At the age of fifteen or sixteen Cyrus is said to have been the
hero of the Medes’ successful defense against the Assyrians’ invasion
of Media (Xenophon, Cyr. 1.4.16-24). Similarly, Alexander the Great
is said to have been sixteen years old when he was left as regent in
Macedonia, at which time he also excelled in war (Plutarch, Alex.
9.1-2). However, while the cases of Cyrus and Alexander may serve
as precedents for this literary motif 20, it seems that Herod’s life was
modeled more specifically not on these classical figures, but rather
on one important biblical precedent of a very young military hero —
King David. Indeed, Tal Ilan has pointed to the biographical similar-
ities between the two kings, and suggested that, upon the instruction
of Herod, Nicolaus modeled his story of Herod’s life on the biblical
story of King David 21. The biblical story of David says that he was
merely a lad when anointed (1 Sam 16,11), and repeats that in the
context of his duel with Goliath (1 Sam 17,33; cf. 17,14). Thus, the
emphasis on Herod’s youth upon his first appointment to office and
shortly before he kills Ezekias “the brigand chief†is very much in
line with the David typology 22.
V. Why Exactly Fifteen Years Old?
Still, the David typology does not explain the specific age of fif-
teen, since David’s age is not specified in either instance in biblical
or extra-biblical traditions. Seemingly, if David was the only inspi-
ration, Nicolaus could have, and should have, left Herod as “a mere
ladâ€. Yet, despite the fact that Herod’s specific age is not stated in
Josephus’ War, Nicolaus appears to have been Josephus’ source for
that datum in the Antiquities as well. For in contrast to Nicolaus,
Josephus, who was certainly more critical of Herod in the Antiqui-
ties and rebuked Nicolaus for his apologetic embellishments of
20
The rabbinic midrash Genesis Rabbah says that Simon and Levi were
only thirteen years old when they took their vengeance on the city of Shechem
(80:10).
21
T. ILAN, “King David, King Herod and Nicolaus of Damascusâ€, JSQ 5
(1998) 195-240.
22
T. ILAN, “David, Herodâ€, 205-206. In addition, the approximate age given
for Herod when he died, seventy, is another parallel with David (2 Sam 5,4).