Jean-Noël Aletti, «James 2,14-26: The Arrangement and Its Meaning», Vol. 95 (2014) 88-101
The main goal of this essay is to demonstrate that the author of the Letter of James knows how to reason according to the rules of arrangement then in place in the schools and elsewhere, rules that he uses with originality. His rhetoric is not Semitic: for him, Greek is not only a language or a style but also what structures the development of his thought. The choice of a chreia as the pattern of arrangement allowed him to repeat an opinion that had become common in some Christian communities and criticize it, showing that it was erroneous. By presenting this common opinion as a maxim (gnoee), he did not need to cite Paul and thereby avoided attributing to him what was only an erroneous recapitulation of his doctrine of justification.
05_Biblica_Aletti_Layout 1 01/04/14 12:04 Pagina 100
100 JEAN-NOËL ALETTI
author? James, the brother of the Lord, whose name is not Greek
in origin and who lived in Palestine at that time? The answer will
surely be no. But could not James, the brother of the Lord, have
dictated his ideas to a Hellenized amanuensis and given to the latter
the care of writing and composing them according to the rules then
in place? This is possible on the condition that the amanuensis had
read the Scriptures like a Jew of the time. And only recently, an-
other hypothesis has been suggested 23, that of pseudepigraphy. The
study of the arrangement of Jas 2,14-26 is not sufficient for pro-
nouncing with certainty on these two positions, both of which are
completely plausible.
* *
*
This essay has had as its main goal to demonstrate that the
choice of a pattern of arrangement has a real impact on the meaning
of a passage and the understanding that one must have of it. The
choice of a chreia allowed James to repeat an opinion that had be-
come common in some Christian communities and to criticize it,
showing that it was erroneous. By presenting the common opinion
as a maxim (gnw,mh), he did not need to cite Paul and thereby
avoided attributing to him what was only an erroneous recapitula-
tion of his doctrine of justification.
It may be useful to recall that other passages in the Letter of James
follow the same argumentative pattern 24. And as these are not the
letter’s only rhetorical units that follow Greek rhetorical models, the
reader is invited to verify that the author of this letter knew how to
reason according to the rules of arrangement then in place in the
schools and elsewhere, rules that he uses with originality. The au-
thor’s rhetoric is not Semitic: for him, Greek is not only a language
or a style but also what structures the development of his thought.
Pontifical Biblical Institute Jean-Noël ALETTI
Via della Pilotta, 25
00187 Rome
23
Cf. ASSAËL-CUVILLIER, Jacques.
24
See the articles of D.F. Watson cited above.