Troy D. Cudworth, «The Division of Israel’s Kingdom in Chronicles: A Re-examination of the Usual Suspects.», Vol. 95 (2014) 498-523
The Chronicler constantly adapts the story of Israel’s kingship from the narrative in Samuel-Kings to show his great interest in the temple. With regard to the division of the united kingdom, recent scholarship has correctly shown how he has removed all the blame from Solomon due to his successful construction of the temple, but it has not come to any firm conclusion on whom the Chronicler does find guilty. This article contends that the Chronicler blames Rehoboam for ignoring the plea of «all Israel», an essential facet of the nation’s temple worship.
002_cudworth_co_498_523 13/02/15 11:26 Pagina 519
THE DIVISION OF ISRAEL’S KINGDOM IN CHRONICLES 519
the construction of the temple (v. 10), which he sought to do from
the very beginning of his reign (2 Chronicles 1–2) and eventually
completed (2 Chronicles 3–7). Abijah opened his speech with
such a loaded statement because he wanted to show how even
though previous regrettable circumstances put YHWH’s promises
into question, they would certainly not negate his covenant with
the Davidic line.
3. The ambiguity in 2 Chr 13,6-7
With the explanation in vv. 6-7, scholars have offered two dif-
ferent interpretations due to the ambiguous terms wynda (“his lord”)
in v. 6 and the pronominal suffix of wyl[ (“about him”) in v. 7. In
one interpretation, Japhet identifies wynda as Solomon so that v. 6
alludes to Jeroboam’s rebellion as recorded in 1 Kgs 11,26-40 64.
As she concedes, this amounts to an unexpected reference since the
Chronicler does not include that part of 1 Kings in his narrative.
Nevertheless, she argues that the strong language of a slave (db[)
rebelling against his lord (wynda) indicates that the seeds of division
were sown well before Rehoboam came to power.
Next, she suggests that the ambiguous pronoun in v. 7 refers to
Jeroboam in the subsequent stage of his revolt. This time “worthless
scoundrels” gather to him so that together they defied (l[ wcmaty)
God’s chosen king. In doing this, she continues, the Chronicler
changes the justifiable complaint made by the people in 1 Kings
into an “irresponsible act of a handful of blackguards”.
Knoppers takes a similar line, but also remarks that the divi-
sion took place when the weak-hearted and inexperienced Re-
hoboam had just assumed the throne, thus alleviating him from
some of the blame he received in 1 Kings 12 65. In addition, this
interpretation places the culpability more squarely on Jeroboam
for taking advantage of the vulnerable king. Following Abijah’s
affirmation of the Davidic kingship in v. 5, this reading of vv. 6-
7 blames the opportunistic Jeroboam for establishing another
kingship illicitly.
64
JAPHET, I & II Chronicles, 691-692.
65
KNOPPERS, “Rehoboam in Chronicles”, 439.