Jonathan H. Walton, «A King Like The Nations: 1 Samuel 8 in Its Cultural Context.», Vol. 96 (2015) 179-200
Commentators on 1 Samuel 8 offer a variety of interpretations about what the requested king is expected to replace: judgeship, YHWH himself, or Israel's covenant identity. This article demonstrates that none of these proposals account for the Biblical text adequately. It is proposed instead that the king is intended to replace the Ark of the Covenant. The king will then manipulate YHWH into leading in battle. This is what ancient Near Eastern kings were able to do with their gods, and what the ark failed to do in 1 Samuel 4.
02_Walton_179_200_179_200 10/07/15 11:58 Pagina 195
195 A KING LIKE THE NATIONS: 1 SAMUEL 8 IN ITS CULTURAL CONTEXT 195
Bergen agrees and also recognizes the parallel themes of ch. 8:
“[Sending for the ark] might have been an attempt by the elders to
twist God’s arm into helping them instead of trying to find out the
reason for God’s displeasure. 1 Sam 8,4 doesn’t speak well for the
elders’ spiritual wisdom” 71. This similarity is also noticed by
Tsumura: “Here [the elders] took the initiative in bringing the ark
of the Lord from Shiloh while Eli was still officially the judge. At
a later time, the elders of Israel took the initiative in demanding a
king of Samuel the judge” 72. He goes on to observe: “The people
treated this sacred object without respect as an instrument through
which victory might be attained. [...] that the ark would inevitably
grant victory is a persistent idea” 73. Likewise Campbell: “The pres-
ence of the ark, therefore, can be counted on to assure victory” 74.
The ark of course fails to achieve this objective, but the story
does not end there. Israel’s military history resumes in 7,7, where
now it is Samuel who is accompanied by YHWH in battle. 1 Sam 7,13
indicates that he fills this role successfully, and the ark is duly aban-
doned (7,2) and plays no further role until it is brought to Jerusalem
by David 75. Since, as noted above, the elders demonstrate little
spiritual enlightenment between chs. 4 and 8, it is likely that they
believe Samuel has YHWH on a leash as well. This is why they are
not rejecting him (8,7); he has performed admirably, as they say so
themselves in ch. 12. But they also have enough pattern recognition
to know that when he goes, his sons are not going to be able to
make the ark “work” any more than Hophni and Phinehas could.
However, rather than “return to the Lord” as Samuel tells them to
do in 7,3 (and again in 12,14.20-21), they fall back on the same
trick of divine manipulation. “You are old, and your sons do not
follow your ways” (5a). Their judge is dying and their palladium
is useless, so what do they ask for? This is the same thing their
neighbors use to manipulate their gods: “Now appoint a king to
lead us, such as all the nations have” (5b).
71
BERGEN, Samuel, 91.
72
TSUMURA, Samuel, 190. See also WÉNIN, Samuel, 146.
73
TSUMURA, Samuel, 190-91.
74
CAMPBELL, Ark, 150.
75
See CAMPBELL, Ark, 201.