Travis B. Williams, «Reciprocity and Suffering in 1 Peter 2,19-20: Reading "caris" in Its Ancient Social Context.», Vol. 97 (2016) 421-439
Scholars have long debated whether "caris" in 1 Pet 2,19-20 should be understood as the unmerited favor which is divinely bestowed upon those who please God, or whether it represents a human action that secures a favorable response from God. What interpreters have continued to overlook, however, are the ancient social dynamics which underlie this passage. By interpreting "caris" within the framework of reciprocity and gift-exchange in the Greco-Roman world, this study brings fresh perspective to a problem which has long divided scholarship, and also suggests a new direction for understanding the letter's theology of suffering.
422 T.B. WIllIAMs
(“this is grace from God”), others contend that the focus is on praise-
worthy human action which finds divine approval (“this is commend-
able before God”). Petrine scholarship has been, and continues to be,
divided over this issue.
Unraveling the meaning of ca,rij in these verses is the goal of the
present inquiry. To do so, we will seek to draw from the expectations
and responsibilities inherent within reciprocal relationships in the
Greco-Roman world. This social context, we will argue, provides the
key to understanding the unique way that the Petrine author employs
ca,rij within his larger theological scheme. Informed by the social dy-
namics of ancient gift-exchange, we will not only propose a solution
to an interpretive problem which has long divided Petrine scholarship,
but also suggest a new direction for understanding the letter’s theology
of suffering.
I. Competing Views of ca,rij in 1 Peter 2,19-20
Before we consider ca,rij in light of ancient systems of reciprocity
and gift-exchange, it is important to understand how the term has tra-
ditionally been interpreted and the problems inherent within each of
these approaches.
1. Ca,rij as Divine Provision
One way that interpreters have understood ca,rij in this passage is
as the unmerited favor which God freely bestows upon those who
please him (normally translated as “grace”). In this way, the term de-
notes a divine provision received by believers. While this view traces
its roots back to post-Reformation perspectives on the theology of
grace, its popularity within Petrine scholarship has remained strong
even up until more recent times. This interpretation coincides with
much of the work that has been done on ca,rij within New Testament
studies in general. Biblical scholars and theologians alike have long
assigned an important theological significance to the term, which dis-
tinguishes it from its traditional usage within other Greco-Roman
source materials 2.
2
A few of the more notable studies which take this approach include: J. MOFFATT,
Grace in the New Testament (london 1931); W. MAsON, “Grace in the New
Testament”, The Doctrine of Grace (ed. W.T. WHITley) (london 1932) 33-60;
R. WINkleR, “Die Gnade im Neuen Testament”, ZST 10 (1933) 642-680;
T.N. sCHUlTz, The Meaning of Charis in the New Testament (Genova 1971).