Ulrich Victor, «Textkritischer Kommentar zu ausgewählten Stellen des Matthäusevangeliums», Vol. 22 (2009) 55-90
In a contaminated manuscript tradition there is no such thing as a 'good' manuscript or a 'good' group of manuscripts. The right reading may be found anywhere in this tradition, even in the smallest parts. There is no other means of deciding between different readings than the tools of philology, and every variant of the text must be considered as a unique case. This will be demonstrated in 33 variants of the text of Matthew's Gospel.
88 Ulrich Victor
(Oxford 21980) 126: „The use of two exemplars for checking helps us to
understand how it comes about that those papyri of the New Testament
which antedate (perhaps by no more than a century) the accepted crys-
tallized tradition of the New Testament agree now with one branch, now
with another, and destroy any argument there may be for the intrinsic su-
periority of one branch over another. In consequence every variant must
be considered individually and weighed as if it were a unique case. It
must be assessed in the light of Greek usage, of the author’s own practice,
of what is known about the subject from all other sources as well as the
manuscript evidence about this particular author (Hervorhebung U.V.).
This has been the practice of editors of papyri for some time past; it now
becomes an imperative duty for all scholars.” In exemplarischer Weise
war G. Zuntz, The Text of the Epistles. A Disquisition upon the Corpus
Paulinum (London 1952, schon 1946 als Schweich Lecture vorgetragen)
bei einem Teil des NT so vorgegangen.
Dr. Ulrich VICTOR
Königsweg 60
D - 14163 Berlin
DEUTSCHLAND
ulrichvictor7@aol.com