Hanna Stettler, «Sanctification in the Jesus Tradition», Vol. 85 (2004) 153-178
According to the Synoptic Jesus tradition, Jesus brings about the eschatological sanctification of Israel promised in Ez 36,22-32 and 37,28. He ushers in the time of the Holy Spirit, and gathers God’s eschatological people, which includes sinners as well as Gentiles. Moreover, he sanctifies people by healing and cleansing them, and teaches them to live a holy life. According to Jesus, the holiness of God’s holy people is no longer jeopardized by ritual impurity. This is not because ritual purity is irrelevant per se, but because in Jesus, the "Holy One of God", God’s holiness has come into the world. Jesus sanctifies people and time so completely that the intention of the ritual Torah is fulfilled. Holiness is now to be lived out through mercy and love, even for one’s enemy.
170 Hanna Stettler
handwashing to his readers†(48). That there was much uncertainty
concerning the issue in the early church, does not necessarily imply that
Jesus did not state his opinion on it clearly. Rom 14,14 (cf. 14,20 and
Tit 1,15) is still best explained as a reference to this saying of Jesus (49).
If he did not “fight†against the law (as Räisänen would have him
do)(50), but declared it to be fulfilled because the basileia had dawned,
and if he did so only in a cryptic way in public (Mark 7,15) but more
clearly in private (as Mark 7,17-18 states and N. T. Wright emphas-
izes) (51), it is conceivable that the church only gradually moved away
from its adherence to the purity Torah (52). It would have done so to the
extent that it realized that it had been called to be the “vanguard of the
eschatological Israel on earthâ€(53). As Mark rightly saw, Jesus will have
taken the issue of washing one’s hands as a starting point, but then
insisted “that genuine purity is a matter of the heart, for which the
normal purity laws … are of no relevance†(54).
(48) WRIGHT, Jesus and the Victory of God, 397.
(49) Counter RÄISÄNEN, “Food Lawsâ€, 87, and in agreement with S.
WESTERHOLM, Jesus and Scribal Authority (CB.NT 10; Lund 1978) 81f. Some
scholars have have pointed out that in the Galatian conflict (cf. Gal 2,11-14), Paul
does not quote any such saying of Jesus (RÄISÄNEN, “Food Lawsâ€, 142f; D.
RUDOLPH, “Jesus and the Food Laws. A Reassessment of Mark 7:19â€, EQ 74
[2002], 301). However, at a closer look it seems that Jesus’ saying as well as its
confirmation reported in Acts 10 are presupposed in Gal 2. In 2,14 Paul can say
that Peter lives “like a Gentile and not like a Jewâ€. What other warrant would
there have been for Peter to “live like a Gentileâ€, if not the word of Jesus?
(50) â€Food Lawsâ€, 87.
(51) Jesus and the Victory of God, 397. Ibid.: “For Mark, the abolition, or
simple ignoring, of Jewish food taboos was not something that needed to be
whispered behind locked doors. By his time it was well out in the openâ€. This
“secrecy unnecessary for the early church†is a hint, that Jesus did say
“cryptically, something much like thisâ€.
(52) Cf. WRIGHT, Jesus and the Victory of God, 397: “The new outlook was
eventually and gradually worked out in the early church, with Mark 7.19b as one
important step in that processâ€.
(53) STUHLMACHER, Biblische Theologie, I, 200 (translation mine). The argu-
ment sometimes adduced in this context (see e.g., KLAWANS, Impurity and Sin,
145; RUDOLPH, “Jesus and the Food Lawsâ€, 301-302), that in early church history
the adherence of Gentile Christians to the purity Torah is witnessed to, needs to be
interpreted the other way round: In church history we more often see a tendency
to greater observance of the law than to greater freedom. It is much more likely
that Jesus declared the food laws to be obsolete and that the church giving in to
pressure from Jewish Christians reintroduced them than the opposite. We see this
very movement towards stricter observance of the law as early as Gal 2,1-14.
(54) WRIGHT, Jesus and the Victory of God, 396.