Jean-Noël Aletti, «Galates 1–2. Quelle fonction et quelle démonstration?», Vol. 86 (2005) 305-323
This article is an attempt to show the following: (1) Galatians 1,11–2,21 is a
unified argument in which vv. 11-12 constitute the propositio; (2) Gal 2,14b-21
represent a short speech bringing the argument to its climax, and (3) Gal 2,16
takes up the Jerusalem agreement about Paul’s Gospel and not only fulfills a
rhetorical function within the short speech of v. 14b-21 but also provides the
thesis of the argument that unfolds in Galatians 3–4.
Galates 1–2 Quelle fonction et quelle démonstration? 323
lorsqu’elles étaient appropriées, les dénominations anciennes. Sans
doute est-il bon de rappeler que l’étiquetage, quel qu’il soit, n’a de
valeur que s’il est adéquat au discours paulinien et à l’intelligence qu’il
en donne.
Pontificio Istituto Biblico Jean-Noël ALETTI
Via della Pilotta, 25
00187 Roma
SUMMARY
This article is an attempt to show the following: (1) Galatians 1,11–2,21 is a
unified argument in which vv. 11-12 constitute the propositio; (2) Gal 2,14b-21
represent a short speech bringing the argument to its climax, and (3) Gal 2,16
takes up the Jerusalem agreement about Paul’s Gospel and not only fulfills a
rhetorical function within the short speech of v. 14b-21 but also provides the
thesis of the argument that unfolds in Galatians 3–4.
FOLLOW US