A.E. Gardner, «Isaiah 65, 20: Centenarians or Millenarians?», Vol. 86 (2005) 88-96
Isa 65,20 which forms part of the future blessings of God’s
servants, subsequent to the inauguration of the new heavens and new earth, is
contentious theologically and linguistically. The present paper investigates why
sinners persist in the future glorious age, concluding that human nature does
not change with the appearance of the new heavens and new earth. Rather the
latter indicate that no longer will the righteous suffer, nor will the land be
devastated, because of the deeds of the unrighteous. Further it is noted that
the usual translation of Isa 65,20 appears not to accord with Isa 65,22. It is
argued that the LXX version is to be rejected as a later rationalisation.
Instead yk
should be taken as the dividing point of the verse and
llq recognised as an
allusion to Job 24,18.
ANIMADVERSIONES
Isaiah 65, 20: Centenarians or Millenarians?
The focal point of the present paper is Isa 65,20 whose meaning has been
disputed. Theologically, it has been questioned why sinners still exist after the
inauguration of the new heavens and new earth. Linguistically, the verse is
awkwardly phrased, leaving open the possibility that the sinner will die at the
ripe old age of one hundred, paralleling the fate of the youth who also dies at
a hundred years old. In order to resolve the difficulties presented by Isa 65,20
it is necessary to consider the context.
*
**
It is likely that Isaiah 65–66 is God’s response (1) to the accusation that
he has hidden his face from his people and not listened to their pleas that he
forget their sins, restore the tribes, Zion, Jerusalem and Temple. Many of
these themes are addressed in Isaiah 65. In verses 1-15 God asserts that he
will no longer treat the people as a corporate entity, rather as individuals who
are accountable for their own actions and who will be punished or rewarded
accordingly (2). In 65,13-15, which Smith (3) thinks is strongly influenced by
Deut 28, 27-48, appear a series of contrasts about the future for the two
groups (4), with God killing those who are not his servants. 65,16 is an
enigmatic verse, which will be amplified later.
(1) It has been suggested by a number of commentators that Isaiah 65–66 is a response
to the plea for justice made in 63,7–64,12 but, whereas the latter block of material is an
appeal for all Israel, Isaiah 65–66 is addressed to a divided community where only the
righteous will be saved cf O.H. STECK, “Beobachtungen zur Anlange von Jes 65-66â€, BN
38-39 (1987) 103-116 reprinted in Studien zu Tritojesaja (Berlin – New York 1991) 217-
228; M. SWEENEY, Isaiah 1–4 and the Post-Biblical Understanding of the Isaiah Tradition
(Berlin 1988) 91 and D.M. CARR, “Reading Isaiah from Beginning (Isaiah 1) to End (Isaiah
65–66): Multiple Modern Possibilitiesâ€, New Visions of Isaiah (eds. R.F. MELEUGIN – M.A.
SWEENEY) (JSOTSS 14; Sheffield 1996) 204-212. P.A. SMITH, Rhetoric and Redaction in
Trito-Isaiah. The Structure, Growth and Authorship of Isaiah 56–66 (Leiden, 1995) 129, n.
9; B. SCHRAMM, The Opponents of Third Isaiah (JSOT Supp; Sheffield 1995) 154.
(2) In the former category are those “who did not seek me†(65,1), “who walk in a way
that is not good, after their own thoughts†(65,2) and appear to be worshipping deities other
than Yahweh (65,3-7.11). In the latter are his “servants†(65,9.13), who are identified as “a
seed out of Jacob, an inheritor out of Judah ...my chosen ones†(65,9). They will inherit
God’s mountains and dwell there (65,9).
(3) SMITH, Rhetoric and Redaction, 143.
(4) The servants will eat, the others will not; the servants will drink, the others will not;
the servants will rejoice, the others will be ashamed; God’s servants “will sing for joy of
heart†but the others “will howl for breaking of spiritâ€; God “will call his servants by
another name†but the others will leave their name for an oath.