Francesca Stavrakopoulou, «Exploring the Garden of Uzza: Death, Burial and Ideologies of Kingship», Vol. 87 (2006) 1-21
The Garden of Uzza (2 Kgs 21,18.26) is commonly regarded as a pleasure garden
in or near Jerusalem which came to be used as a royal burial ground once the tombs
in the City of David had become full. However, in this article it is argued that the
religious and cultic significance of royal garden burials has been widely
overlooked. In drawing upon comparative evidence from the ancient Near East, it
is proposed that mortuary gardens played an ideological role within perceptions of
Judahite kingship. Biblical texts such as Isa 65,3-4; 66,17 and perhaps 1,29-30 refer
not to goddess worship, but to practices and sacred sites devoted to the royal dead.
16 Francesca Stavrakopoulou
frequent of images to decorate the marbled palace walls is the repeated
scene of the sacred tree. The recurrent association of this motif and its
variations with Neo-Assyrian kingship is widely recognized, though a
consensus is yet to be reached concerning its meaning and function (63).
Seth Richardson has conducted a detailed study of the sacred tree
scene and the nature of its occurrences in the Northwest palace (64). He
finds that whilst this scene might include images of the king or divine
figures, it most frequently occurs alone and as the dominant motif in
the palace, appearing 190 times throughout all its buildings, 96 of
these in Room I, in which the sacred tree is the only motif. Though the
function of this room is not clearly discernable, most are agreed that it
was employed for a ritual purpose, and it seems probable that the
room’s function was bound up with the sacred trees covering its walls.
Richardson observes that the number of sacred trees in Room I closely
approximates the number of deceased kings listed in contemporary
recensions of the Assyrian King List, that is, 100 dead kings. This, plus
the near-correlation of 96 sacred trees in Room I and 94 sacred trees
throughout the remainder of the palace, suggests that the repeated
motif of the sacred tree represents a system directly related to the ritual
use of the Assyrian King List. Accordingly, a plausible case can be
constructed in arguing that each sacred tree in Room I represents a
dead king (65), and that this room played a role in a cult of royal
ancestor veneration. This “garden of ancestorsâ€, as Richardson
describes it, would have been of crucial ideological importance to
Aππurnas≥irpal II, for in relocating his capital, he was leaving behind
the royal tombs situated conventionally beneath the old palace. “A
venerative royal cult to ancestors, situated on a grand scale in the new
Kal˙u palace, would have supported Aππurnas≥irpal II’s claims to
legitimate and traditional kingship, and would have solved the peculiar
(63) E.g., B.N. PORTER, “Sacred Trees, Date Palms, and the Royal Persona of
Ashurnasirpal IIâ€, JNES 52 (1993) 129-139; S. PARPOLA, “The Assyrian Tree of
Life: Tracing the Origins of Jewish Monotheism and Greek Philosophyâ€, JNES
52 (1993) 161-208.
(64) “An Assyrian Garden of Ancestors: Room I, Northwest Palace, KalË™uâ€,
SAAB 13 (1999-2001) 145-216. I am grateful to Stephanie Dalley for bringing this
article to my attention.
(65) In his discussion, Richardson is quick to acknowledge and to address the
apparent disparity between the numbers of sacred trees and dead kings, for which
he offers several solutions based upon new reconstructions of Room I and the
arrangement of its trees, the grouping of dead kings into their dynasties, and
comparative evidence concerning inconsistencies in Egyptian king lists.