A.E. Gardner, «Decoding Daniel: The Case of Dan 7,5», Vol. 88 (2007) 222-233
The interpretation of almost every detail of the description on the bear in Daniel 7 is disputed by scholars, mainly because of the uncertainty about the background of the imagery of the beasts. The present paper reviews suggested backgrounds and shows that while many have some appropriate elements, they are unable to explain all the details of the beasts or their actions. The Bible is shown to be the source of all aspects of Dan 7,5. Proceeding from Hos 13,5, the author utilized prophecies of the downfall of Babylon, supplemented from elsewhere in the Bible, to paint his picture of the second beast who is to be identified as Media and Persia.
Decoding Daniel: The Case of Dan 7,5 233
established as one Empire. However, because no Biblical text, on a surface
reading, admitted the link, the author(s) of Daniel had to delve more deeply.
The key text of Isa 13,5 which indicated that Yahweh would bring the
“weapons of his indignation†to destroy Babylon led to Job 38,32 which
referred to a constellation, not an earthly creature. A constellation, though,
which was known as the “bearâ€!
The new identification of the second beast has implications for the
identity of the other beasts. As the second beast is a combination of Media
and Persia, the third beast must be Greece. Indeed such a conclusion is
implicit in its description, even on a simple literary level. The beast is a
leopard, therefore it is fast. Further it has wings, underlining the speed with
which it conquers. Its wings are four-fold, like its heads, indicating the four
points of the compass. Alexander the Great’s conquests are here indicated,
not those of Persia, as usually thought. The fourth beast is not as easy to
identify on a literary level. As with the rest of Daniel’s vision, including the
description of the second beast, I have considered it on an intertextual level,
and have concluded that it is partly Greek/Seleucid and partly Israelite. The
reason it is so terrible is because the Israelite portion should have known
better. The ten horns are drawing on passages relating to Ephraim and
Manasseh, the arch-enemies in the Qumran texts. However this will be
demonstrated in detail in a future publication.
Religion Studies A.E. GARDNER
La Trobe University
Victoria 3086 – Australia
SUMMARY
The interpretation of almost every detail of the description on the bear in Daniel
7 is disputed by scholars, mainly because of the uncertainty about the background
of the imagery of the beasts. The present paper reviews suggested backgrounds
and shows that while many have some appropriate elements, they are unable to
explain all the details of the beasts or their actions. The Bible is shown to be the
source of all aspects of Dan 7,5. Proceeding from Hos 13,5, the author utilized
prophecies of the downfall of Babylon, supplemented from elsewhere in the
Bible, to paint his picture of the second beast who is to be identified as Media and
Persia.