A.E. Gardner, «Decoding Daniel: The Case of Dan 7,5», Vol. 88 (2007) 222-233
The interpretation of almost every detail of the description on the bear in Daniel 7 is disputed by scholars, mainly because of the uncertainty about the background of the imagery of the beasts. The present paper reviews suggested backgrounds and shows that while many have some appropriate elements, they are unable to explain all the details of the beasts or their actions. The Bible is shown to be the source of all aspects of Dan 7,5. Proceeding from Hos 13,5, the author utilized prophecies of the downfall of Babylon, supplemented from elsewhere in the Bible, to paint his picture of the second beast who is to be identified as Media and Persia.
232 A.E. Gardner
eagle. Further the bear had ˆy[l[ between its teeth. This word is cognate with
“suck up†(w[l[y) in Job. ˆy[l[ in Dan 7,5 then as a nominal form should be
translated as “ones who suck up†or “suckersâ€. Job 39,30 also says of the
eagle “where the slain (µyllj) are, there is itâ€. This links with Jer 51,49, “... at
Babylon shall fall the slain (yllj) of all the landâ€.
That the “bear†is told to devour much flesh should be understood in the
context of Babylon being likened to a sacrifice in Jer 51,40. There Yahweh
says, “I will bring them down like lambs to the slaughter, like rams with he-
goatsâ€.
None of the above passages however throw any light on why there were
three suckers or why the word “flesh†(rçb) was included in the instruction to
the bear. 1 Sam 2,13-14 provides the answer:
when any man offered sacrifice, the servant
13
of the priest came while the flesh (rçb)
was seething and the fleshhook with
three teeth (µynçh çlç) was in his hand.
And he struck it into the pot ...
14
and all the fleshook took up (hl[y) (60)
the priest took for himself...
As was seen in Dan Jer 51,40 Babylon was to be “slaughteredâ€. Now her
“flesh†(rçb of Dan 7,5) (61) is ready to be drawn up by the fleshhook with
three teeth. Interestingly glzm (fleshhook) has the basic meaning of “to draw
upâ€, thus linking with the Aramaic ˆy[l[, adduced to derive from the verbal
form w[l[y which appears in Job, but is hapax legomena there.
That the bear was told to “arise†(ymwq) is probably an allusion to Jer 51,1
where God says, in the context of the coming destruction of Babylon, “I will
raise (ymq) a destroying wind (jwr)â€. jwr here calls to mind the four winds (yjwr)
of heaven which broke forth on the great sea causing the beasts to come up or
arise. (Dan 7,2-3). More importantly though jwr is defined in Jer 51,11 in
terms which relate to the second beast:
Yahweh has established the spirit (jwr)
of the kings of Media because his device is
against Babylon to destroy it ...
*
**
The Biblical prophecies of the downfall of Babylon are behind the
activity of the second beast, although these have been supplemented from Job
and elsewhere. Hos 13,7-8 is likely to have been the primary impetus behind
the choice of the “bear†to represent the Medes and Persians who were
(60) This passage suggests that the aramaic root [l[ should be understood as related to
the hebrew hl[ ‘go up’.
(61) The last stanza of Dan 7,5 “Arise, devour much flesh†(aygç rçb ylka ymwq) has
caused problems for commentators, mainly because they have adduced the three ˆy[l[
which were in the mouth, between the teeth of the bear, to be the remnants of foodstuffs.
However the reference to “flesh†has been explained by 1 Sam 2,13-14 which contains rçb
and by the realisation that Babylon is pictured as a sacrifice.