A.E. Gardner, «Decoding Daniel: The Case of Dan 7,5», Vol. 88 (2007) 222-233
The interpretation of almost every detail of the description on the bear in Daniel 7 is disputed by scholars, mainly because of the uncertainty about the background of the imagery of the beasts. The present paper reviews suggested backgrounds and shows that while many have some appropriate elements, they are unable to explain all the details of the beasts or their actions. The Bible is shown to be the source of all aspects of Dan 7,5. Proceeding from Hos 13,5, the author utilized prophecies of the downfall of Babylon, supplemented from elsewhere in the Bible, to paint his picture of the second beast who is to be identified as Media and Persia.
Decoding Daniel: The Case of Dan 7,5 231
6. Mouth and Teeth
“Mouth†and “teeth†can be synonyms for aggression (cf Lam 2,16; 3,46;
Ezek 21,27 {22}; Isa 9,11 {12}; Deut 32,24; Ps 57,4; Prov 30,14). The last
three citations are particularly interesting in the present context. Deut 32,24
states, “... the teeth of beasts I will send upon them …â€, an obvious verse
connecting with the teeth of the bear.
The other two citations identify “teeth†with weapons of war: Ps 57,4
says, “... whose teeth are spears and arrows …†and Prov 30,14, “... whose
teeth are swords …â€. Both these passages are descriptive of people who are
enemies, although in the former the enemies are likened to wild beasts (lions).
Interestingly, one of the hymns from Qumran has a similar description
concerning lion cubs: “whose teeth are like a sword, whose molars are like a
sharpened spear†(55).
These passages are bridges which link the teeth of the bear in Daniel with
both the key text of Isa 13,5 where “weapons of my indignation†appears (cf
also Jer 50,25) and a number of passages which specify the weapons used by
those bringing about the downfall of Babylon. A sword is the instrument in
Jer 25,27.29; 50,35-37 (five times), arrows in Jer 50,9 and 51,11 and the spear
in 50,42.
7. Three ˆy[l[ and the order to “Arise, devour much fleshâ€
The three ˆy[l[ instruct the bear to “Arise, devour much fleshâ€. They are,
therefore, unlikely to be an integral physical characteristic of the bear. The
notion of “devouring†alludes to Jeremiah’s use of the verb lka to refer to
Babylon. In 30,16 God promises Israel, “All who devour you will be
devoured†(wlky ˚ylkaAlk) and in 51,34 it is stated, “Nebuchadnezzar, King of
Babylon, has devoured us/me†(wnlka) (56).
Thus Babylon is due to be devoured in turn. The bear who is to carry out
the “devouring†has already been identified. One aspect of the bear is Persia.
It is symbolised in Isa 46,11 as a “bird of preyâ€. Job 39,27-30 has two points
of contact with Isa 46,10b-11a for a bird of prey (57) is the subject and it sees
its prey from afar (58). The passage reads,
Does a bird of prey mount up at your command…
27
From there it searches out prey (lka)
29
Its eyes see from afar off (qwjrml)
And its (59) brood
30
sucks up (w[l[y) blood
and where the slain (µyllj) are there is itâ€.
This passage also has two linguistic similarities to Dan 7,5. There the
bear was told to devour (ylka) which links with the ‘prey’ (lka) seen by the
(55)1Q Hymns XIII:10 The translation is from F. GARCIA MARTINEZ, The Dead Sea
Scrolls Translated. The Qumran Texts in English (Leiden – Grand Rapids 1996).
(56) There is a textual fault here.
(57) Isa 46,11 employs fy[ for bird of prey/eagle, whereas Job 39,27 uses rçn.
(58) Isa 46,11 has qjrm ≈ram and Job 39,29 has qwjrml thus there is some linguistic
coherence.
(59) There is a textual fault here.