Gregory T.K. Wong, «Song of Deborah as Polemic», Vol. 88 (2007) 1-22
Focusing on its rhetorical structure, this article argues that the Song of Deborah in Judg 5 may have been composed not so much primarily to celebrate a victory, but to serve as a polemic against Israelite non-participation in military campaigns
against foreign enemies. Possible implications of such a reading on the song’s relationship with the prose account in Judg 4 and its date of composition are also explored.
20 Gregory T.K. Wong
Regarding that last point, to be sure, Levin dismisses the references
to the non-participants as later additions and sees the information
regarding the participating tribes not mentioned in Judges 4 as having
been derived from the preceding narrative about Ehud and from Josh
17 (45). In doing so, Levin seems to imply that the core of the song was
composed after the narratives of the various judges (or at the very least,
the Ehud and Deborah-Barak narratives) have already been compiled
into some kind of continuous narrative. But if so, then why compose a
thanksgiving song only for the deliverance under Deborah and Barak
and not for the other deliverances? And why would later redactors feel
the need to add further material to explain the absence of certain tribes
from this particular war alone when in subsequent wars led by other
judges such as Gideon and Jephthah, even fewer tribes were involved
with no explanations given for their absences?
Thus, all things considered, what is more likely is that both prose
and poetic accounts were based on essentially the same source material
or had similar knowledge of the same historical event, but that each
author had independently chosen to include different details to fit his
specific rhetorical goal. Incidentally, such a conclusion actually
coincides with that drawn by Younger on the basis of his analysis of
other parallel prose and poetic accounts in the ancient Near East (46).
But if the Song of Deborah was indeed composed independently of
the prose account primarily as a polemic against Israelite non-partici-
pation in military campaigns against external enemies, then the next
logical question, which has implications for the date of composition for
the song, should concern the ostensible setting under which an author
would be motivated to compose such a song.
Clearly, one possibility would be that the song was in fact
composed shortly after the events referred to, so that the polemic was
indeed directed against the non-participants in the war against Sisera.
Another possibility would be that the song was composed by none
other than the author/redactor of the book of Judges, since the polemic
so prominent in the song actually contributes to two ongoing motifs
within the book having to do with increasing reluctance on the part of
Israelite tribes and cities to participate in liberation wars and a
(45) LEVIN, “Das Alterâ€, 128-130, 136-137.
(46) K.L. YOUNGER, JR., “Heads! Tails! Or the Whole Coin?! Contextual
Method & Intertextual Analysis: Judges 4 and 5â€, The Biblical Canon in
Comparative Perspective (ed. K.L. YOUNGER, JR. – W.W. HALLO – B.F. BATTO)
(Scripture in Context IV; Lampeter 1991) 135.