Nadav Na’aman, «The Israelite-Judahite Struggle for the Patrimony of Ancient Israel», Vol. 91 (2010) 1-23
The article addresses the controversial issue of the formation of "biblical Israel" in biblical historiography. It begins by presenting the political-cultural struggle between Assyria and Babylonia in the second and first millennia BCE, in part over
the question of ownership of the cultural patrimony of ancient Mesopotamia. It goes on to examine relations between Judah and Israel and compares them to those between Assyria and Babylonia. It then suggests that the adoption of the Israelite
identity by Judah, which took place during the reign of Josiah as part in his cultic reform, was motivated by the desire to take possession of the highly prestigious heritage of Israel, which had remained vacant since that kingdom’s annexation by
Assyria in 720 BCE.
18 NADAV NA’AMAN
The inhabitants of the province of Samerina would have seen
themselves as the natural heirs of the patrimony of ancient Israel,
and it would have been distinctly odd for Judean authors, living in
the neighbouring province of Yehud, suddenly to start claiming a
heritage that had never been their own.
When, therefore, was the new ethno-religious-cultural identity
of “Israel†first adopted by Judahite historiographers and prophets
to describe the inhabitants of both kingdoms? Might it be dated
shortly after the Assyrian annexation of the Kingdom of Israel, in
the late 8th – early 7th century BCE ? This, too, is unlikely. Assyria
had been the dominant power in the Syro-Palestinian arena for about
a century, and forcefully governed the provinces established in
the territories of the former Kingdom of Israel. Following
Sennacherib’s destructive campaign of 701 BCE, Judah was a loyal
vassal of Assyria and was mainly preoccupied in restoring its
severely damaged territories. Under these circumstances, when
J u d a h made efforts to strength its internal cohesion and
re-consolidate its identity that were severely damaged by the
Assyrian campaign, it is difficult to imagine that Judahite scribes
and prophets would have sought a new identity and tried to absorb
the heritage of what was now Assyrian-controlled territory.
The situation changed dramatically, however, after the Assyrian
withdrawal from the Syro-Palestinian arena in the last third of the
7th century BCE. While the political status and institutions of Judah
remained intact, the administrative frameworks and internal
cohesion of the Assyrian provinces must have collapsed, and they
had no army with which to defend themselves. Egypt was a sort of
“ successor state†for the territories vacated by Assyria, including
Judah and the province of Samerina, but was mainly engaged in the
coastal areas and could not effectively control the internal regions of
Syria-Palestine. Josiah (639-609) was then king of Judah and was
able to operate with no organized resistance in the highlands areas
north of his kingdom, and expand into the former Israelite
territories 42.
N. NA’AMAN, “The Kingdom of Judah under Josiahâ€, Tel Aviv 18 (1991)
42
33-60. A slightly revised and updated version of the article was recently
published in L.L. GRABBE (ed.), Good Kings and Bad Kings (Library of
Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies 393 ; London – New York 2005) 210-233.