Nadav Na’aman, «The Israelite-Judahite Struggle for the Patrimony of Ancient Israel», Vol. 91 (2010) 1-23
The article addresses the controversial issue of the formation of "biblical Israel" in biblical historiography. It begins by presenting the political-cultural struggle between Assyria and Babylonia in the second and first millennia BCE, in part over
the question of ownership of the cultural patrimony of ancient Mesopotamia. It goes on to examine relations between Judah and Israel and compares them to those between Assyria and Babylonia. It then suggests that the adoption of the Israelite
identity by Judah, which took place during the reign of Josiah as part in his cultic reform, was motivated by the desire to take possession of the highly prestigious heritage of Israel, which had remained vacant since that kingdom’s annexation by
Assyria in 720 BCE.
6 NADAV NA’AMAN
clarify the formation of “biblical Israel†as depicted in biblical
historiography, we must first clarify the following questions: What
did the authors of these historiographical works seek to gain by
describing the history of Israel in this manner? Under what
circumstances was the name “Israel†extended to include the
Kingdom of Judah and its inhabitants? Did this begin at the time of
the monarchy — or only after its downfall, when the name “Judahâ€,
like “Israelâ€, had also lost its political-territorial connotation?
Internal biblical research to date has not satisfactorily explained
the emergence of the concept of united Israel in biblical
historiography. To find a way out of the deadlock, we must look
outside the narrow confines of the biblical text. To this end, in the
following sections I shall draw an analogy with Assyrian-
Babylonian relations in the second millennium and first half of the
first millennium BCE. This, I believe, sheds new light on the decision
of Judahite scribes and the elite to extend the names “Israel†and
“ Israelites †to their own country and its people, and may even help
to establish when this religious-ideological shift occurred.
I. The Assyrian-Babylonian Struggle over the Political
and Cultural Heritage of Mesopotamia
Scribal activity and learning in Mesopotamia began in its
southern regions, with the first intelligible texts written in Sumerian.
The city of Uruk was probably the major political centre where
writing and learning first developed, and spread from there to other
urban centres — first in lower Mesopotamia, then further upstream,
along the river valleys, to the north (Assyria) and the west (Mari)
and Ebla. In the late third millennium BCE the centre of learning
shifted to Ur, where writing was fully integrated into the
administrative system, and a great variety of Sumerian texts were
produced within the walls of the local scribal schools. In the latter
part of the third millennium, writing in Akkadian also developed,
gradually becoming the preferred language of scribes by the Old
Babylonian period. From the early second millennium BCE onwards,
Sumerian was confined to schools and studied by scribes as part of
their training. A full command of Akkadian and Sumerian became
the standard requirement for students seeking to join the “guild†of
professional scribes in Mesopotamia.