Nadav Na’aman, «The Israelite-Judahite Struggle for the Patrimony of Ancient Israel», Vol. 91 (2010) 1-23
The article addresses the controversial issue of the formation of "biblical Israel" in biblical historiography. It begins by presenting the political-cultural struggle between Assyria and Babylonia in the second and first millennia BCE, in part over
the question of ownership of the cultural patrimony of ancient Mesopotamia. It goes on to examine relations between Judah and Israel and compares them to those between Assyria and Babylonia. It then suggests that the adoption of the Israelite
identity by Judah, which took place during the reign of Josiah as part in his cultic reform, was motivated by the desire to take possession of the highly prestigious heritage of Israel, which had remained vacant since that kingdom’s annexation by
Assyria in 720 BCE.
15
THE ISRAELITE-JUDAHITE STRUGGLE
hand — such as the highlands of Judah, the Beersheba Valley and
the Upper Shephelah — were largely peripheral and sparsely
populated until the late 9th century BCE.
The Northern Kingdom was a multifaceted state, comprising a
heterogeneous population of diversified ethnic origin and cultic and
cultural traditions, including many descendants of the former
Canaanite population. No wonder, therefore, that it absorbed many
religious concepts and cultic and cultural elements of Canaanite
origin. Moreover, Israel bordered culturally influential kingdoms
such as Aram Damascus and Tyre, and gradually absorbed cultic
and cultural elements from its neighbours. Judah, on the other hand,
was demographically quite homogenous, made up of settled local
groups with pastoral roots. It was much more isolated, having a
common border with only the two continental Philistine kingdoms
of Ekron and Gath. Well until the 8th century, it lagged in all aspects
of state organization and urban culture far behind its northern
neighbour 38.
During the 9th century several major cities in the Northern
Kingdom were fortified (Hazor, Megiddo, Rehob, Jokneam, Jezreel,
Dor and Gezer) and palaces as well as other public structures
erected. By the 9th century the kingdom had evolved into what
sociologists call a “mature stateâ€: a well-developed territorial-
political entity, with a settlement system comprising hundreds of
settlements of various sizes. Not surprisingly, Israel is mentioned
quite prominently in 9th century royal inscriptions of the kings of
Assyria (Shalmaneser III, Adad-nirari III), Aram (Hazael) and
Moab (Mesha).
By contrast, only a few dozen small, indigent settlements
occupied the territory of Judah in the 9th century. Excavations in the
City of David in Jerusalem have revealed scant traces of settlement
during this period. That said, we must not forget the formidable
challenges of excavating such a mountainous site, which has been
Ancient Israel, and Their Neighbors from the Late Bronze Age through Roman
Palaestina. Proceedings of the Centennial Symposium, W.F. Albright Institute
of Archaeological Research and American Schools of Oriental Research,
Jerusalem, May 29-31, 2000 (eds. W.G. DEVER – S. GITIN) (Winona Lake,
IN 2003) 75-83.
I. FINKELSTEIN, “State Formation in Israel and Judah: A Contrast in
38
Context, a Contrast in Trajectoryâ€, NEA 62 (1999) 39-44.