Mariam J. Kamell, «The Implications of Grace for The Ethics of James», Vol. 92 (2011) 274-287
The Epistle of James has been considered one of the most practical pieces of writings in the New Testament, and yet it has been consistently neglected in the writings of both New Testament scholars and ethicists. This neglect most likely derives from a failure to understand the theological underpinning for the imperatives in James, perceived as ethics in a vacuum. Understood correctly, the three areas of James’ ethical concern: speech ethics, social justice, and moral purity, stem from God’s own character and his redemption of his chosen people, making his ethics among the most theologically developed of the New Testament.
284 MARIAM J. KAMELL
ther the dichotomy seen in 1,22-25: without obedience there is only self-
deception. Each person is called to be a “doer of the word,†the very word
given by God’s redemptive grace in 1,17. The problem is simple: in 1,5,
God is described as the one who “gives to everyone generously and
without begrudgingâ€, and yet in 2,15 the so-called believer responds to the
impoverished fellow believer with the words of a hollow blessing: “Go,
be warm and well fed†35. James uses this example to shock his audience
with the emptiness of mere words, but it also fits within his philosophy
that those who have been reborn by God ought to act as he acts. Laws,
who argues that this is an example of the “reverential periphrasisâ€, notes
the piety in this expression, for it expresses a hope not only that the needs
will be cared for but moreover that God will protect the person 36. The
wealthier members of the congregation have not comprehended the im-
plications of God’s generosity, and this figure’s very speech condemns his
own unwillingness to be the means of God’s help to the poor. In contrast,
the examples of Abraham and Rahab, who put their very lives and futures
on the line in response to their faith, show us the path to justification. By
having one’s priorities mirror God’s and acting on them, one pleases
God (2,13).
This can be seen again as people willingly partake in the overturning
of this world’s system. Obviously the statement of 1,9-11 that the poor
should “rejoice†in their coming elevation and the rich should “rejoice†in
their humiliation shows an awareness that status in this present age means
very little in an eschatological sense 37. But in 2,1-9 the audience is
enjoined not to take part in judging as the world judges (see 1 Sam 16 and
the story of Samuel and David there) but engage what it means for God to
have chosen “the poor in the eyes of the worldâ€. Clearly, “the eyes of the
kosmov †should not be the lense through which the believer views the
Â¥
world ! The eyes of the world are squint, leaving the community in dire
need of divine contact lenses by which they can finally judge between the
These verbs could be either middle (NIV; MARTIN, James, 85) or
35
passive voice (NASB; LAWS, James, 121 ). MOO, James, 125, concludes that
either way “the point is the same: confronted with a need among his own
brothers and sisters, this ‘believer’ does nothing but express his good wishesâ€.
LAWS, James, 121.
36
See KAMELL, “Economics of Humilityâ€, 157-75, for a discussion
37
r e g a r d i n g the use of humility/humiliation language in James. See
H.H.D. WILLIAMS, III, “Of Rags and Riches: The Benefits of Hearing Jere-
miah 9:23-24 Within James 1:9-11â€, TynB 53 (2002) 282, who concludes that
this is a “heroic boast of believers†based on the background of Jer. 9,23-24,
making this another example of seeing the world through God’s eyes rather
than following a human priority on wealth.