Mariam J. Kamell, «The Implications of Grace for The Ethics of James», Vol. 92 (2011) 274-287
The Epistle of James has been considered one of the most practical pieces of writings in the New Testament, and yet it has been consistently neglected in the writings of both New Testament scholars and ethicists. This neglect most likely derives from a failure to understand the theological underpinning for the imperatives in James, perceived as ethics in a vacuum. Understood correctly, the three areas of James’ ethical concern: speech ethics, social justice, and moral purity, stem from God’s own character and his redemption of his chosen people, making his ethics among the most theologically developed of the New Testament.
286 MARIAM J. KAMELL
acknowledging, confessing and removing the areas of compromise that
prevent them from single-minded devotion to the redemptive word of
God. By participating in the process, they clear the ground for the
planting of the word, as in Jesus’ parable of the sower and the seeds in
Matt 13 (par. Luke 8,5-8; Mark 4,3-9). There, the seeds that fell among
entangling commitments were choked out and failed to bear fruit. Only
the seeds that fell upon the prepared ground bore the fruit that they were
intended to bear. Here, James urges his audience to prepare their hearts so
that they can receive the word “which has the power to save [their]
souls â€. For the word to bear its fruit, the moral impurities of a faulty
worldview — a preference for wealth, tendencies toward greed, envy,
argumentativeness — must be pruned out. This command, remember,
comes after the triumphant pronouncement of God’s willingness to
redeem by his word. This is a call to respond, to participate, and to accept
the work that God is doing. Likewise in Jas 4,4-10, after a harsh repri-
mand and labeling his audience adulteresses for their moral infidelity to
God, the author calls them to “repent,†“wash,†and “purify†themselves
in strongly ritualistic and covenantal language. Much as in Hosea and the
other prophets, the audience members have scattered their loves abroad
and have garnered this violent condemnation by James. He calls them to
repent of their love affair with the kosmov and to seek the purity that God
Â¥
wants for his people: purity in speech, deed, and worldview.
* *
*
These three areas of ethics, namely speech, social, and moral, all
emanate from God’s own character and are required behavior of those
who claim to have been reborn by his word. God is shown in the text to
be wholly consistent, and his singleness of nature means that he cannot
endure duplicitous speech. Likewise, as the one who will execute justice
against the oppressors on behalf of those suffering, those in the church
must care for the poor and helpless of society. And finally, because of the
purity in goodness that is a central aspect of God’s nature, God’s people
are called to moral purity in their thoughts, choices, and relationships.
James 1,4 presents the telos of the Christian life as becoming teleioi kaı
¥ ù
oloklhroi, living representatives of the very character of God.
Ω¥
James gives his audience a two-fold warning against self-deception:
they ought to know who God is in all his generosity and purity and be
transformed in obedience to the word by which he rebirthed them. The
ethics of James are not some sort of “works-righteousness†but a trium-
phant acceptance of God’s grace. God has given birth to his “firstfruitsâ€
by the “word of truthâ€, but this is the same “word†which must be