Mariam J. Kamell, «The Implications of Grace for The Ethics of James», Vol. 92 (2011) 274-287
The Epistle of James has been considered one of the most practical pieces of writings in the New Testament, and yet it has been consistently neglected in the writings of both New Testament scholars and ethicists. This neglect most likely derives from a failure to understand the theological underpinning for the imperatives in James, perceived as ethics in a vacuum. Understood correctly, the three areas of James’ ethical concern: speech ethics, social justice, and moral purity, stem from God’s own character and his redemption of his chosen people, making his ethics among the most theologically developed of the New Testament.
276 MARIAM J. KAMELL
I. James’ Theo-logy
James cautions his audience in Jas 1,16: “Do not be deceived, my
dear brothers and sistersâ€. This warning reflects back upon the previous
pericope’s warning against the temptation to blame God for one’s own
sin, but it also points forward to the reality of God’s nature as the source
of every good gift. This first of the self-deception warnings stems from
James’s concern that his audience correctly understand God’s character,
God’s nature as generous and pure, and his role as Judge. Tangentially,
James’s introduction, combined with his integration of Jesus’ teaching,
reveals James to have a high view of Jesus as the Christ and divine, and
as such his moral teaching is heavily dependent upon Jesus’ teaching.
That, however, is well covered by others and not the focus of this paper 10.
James begins the epistle with encouragement in time of trials, con-
cluding : “But if any of you lacks in wisdom, let him ask of the giving
God, who gives to all generously and without begrudging, and it will be
given to him†(1,5). This last verse gives us a crucial insight into the au-
thor’s understanding of God. He calls God toy didontov ueoy, using
˜ ¥ ˜
the descriptive participle as the very title of God and making it absolutely
clear that this generosity is a primary and repeated trait of God. Also,
instead of qualifying an elite group as the recipients of this generosity,
James specifies that God gives to everyone (pasin) generously. The term
˜
aplwv, here translated as “generously†could also mean something more
Ω˜
like “single-mindedly†11, an idea which makes a great deal of sense in
contrast with the “double-minded†person about to appear in 1,7, a person
presented as the antithesis of all that God is and wants 12. God does not
second-guess his generosity; he does not waver or doubt. In this regard
his character might be called “simpleâ€: he gives generously and without
reservation, doubt, or hesitation. Depending on how one translates this
term, it can support the image of God’s purity of will as well as his liber-
ality. Regardless, James makes it clear that God gives to anyone who asks
without stinting. As if that were not enough, James then adds that God
gives “without reproachâ€. This phrase not only expands the picture of
R. BAUCKHAM, James. Wisdom of James, Disciple of Jesus the Sage
10
(London 1999); W.H. WACHOB, The Voice of Jesus in the Social Rhetoric of
James (SNTSMS 106; Cambridge 2000); J.S. KLOPPENBORG, “The Emulation
of the Jesus Tradition in the Letter of Jamesâ€, Reading James with New Eyes.
Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of James (eds. R.L. Webb –
J.S. Kloppenborg) (London 2007) 121-150.
MOO, James, 59.
11
It (aplwv) could also mean “sincerely, without hesitationâ€. Cf.
Ω˜
12
P.H. DAVIDS, The Epistle of James (NIGTC ; Grand Rapids, MI 1982) 72-73.