Mariam J. Kamell, «The Implications of Grace for The Ethics of James», Vol. 92 (2011) 274-287
The Epistle of James has been considered one of the most practical pieces of writings in the New Testament, and yet it has been consistently neglected in the writings of both New Testament scholars and ethicists. This neglect most likely derives from a failure to understand the theological underpinning for the imperatives in James, perceived as ethics in a vacuum. Understood correctly, the three areas of James’ ethical concern: speech ethics, social justice, and moral purity, stem from God’s own character and his redemption of his chosen people, making his ethics among the most theologically developed of the New Testament.
281
THE IMPLICATIONS GRACE THE ETHICS JAMES
OF FOR OF
the passage is that his people can trust God not only to give his wisdom
generously but also to right the wrongs that oppression wreaks in this
world. This theme appears most strongly again in James 2,1-7 with the au-
thor’s frustration at the discrimination his audience is exhibiting, and also
in James 5,1-12 with the woe oracle against the wealthy and the encoura-
gement to the oppressed to persevere. In a theological framework in
which the Lord works to rectify wrongdoing and oppression, the idea that
the Lord is near (5,9) would indeed be a comfort—or a warning.
Another area of James’ theology is God’s nature as pure, single-
minded, and in opposition to all things tainted and duplicitious. We see
this first introduced in 1,6-8 with the warning that God will not honor the
prayers of the dıcyxov. The problem is simply that they stand in opposi-
Â¥
tion to God’s nature as the “single-minded†giver. The programmatic
statement in 1,27 teaches that God desires worship from those who care
for the widows and orphans and “keep themselves unstained by the
world â€. Lockett argues that James understands the kosmov as the entire
Â¥
“ world-system â€, the entirety of a culture’s values in which people are
embedded and by which they are unconsciously shaped. This cultural
system is, however, one of antipathy to the divine value system 26. In 4,4
James makes his strongest prophetic statement about this when he de-
nounces : “adulteresses! Don’t you know that friendship with the world
(kosmov) is hatred toward God?†Attraction to this world leads repeatedly
Â¥
to “instabilityâ€, chaos, and even death. In contrast, the wisdom of God is
described as primarily “pure†in 3,17, and out of this purity the other
traits of divine wisdom then flow. Davids contends that the “purity†of
3,17 is a participation in God’s own purity of character marked by un-
mixed obedience to God’s commands and service to God alone without
compromise to the culture 27. The believer ought to strive, then, for both
moral purity from the kosmov and for purity of attachment to God and
Â¥
God’s ways alone. In this purity each is to endure and hold fast, so that
all can win God’s approbation.
To summarize, then, James’ main theological points are as follows:
God is the generous giver (1,5) before whom all are leveled (1,9-11) and
who rewards the faithful (1,12). James 1,17-18 provides the theological
underpinnings for all that James later commands: God is the Father who
gives manifold good gifts to all, but particularly to his own whom he has
chosen through his grace to bring into his new creation. He opposes the
proud and the double-minded, and he cares for the poor. Throughout the
epistle, God is the just Judge of his people who will judge them based on
D. LOCKETT, Purity and Worldview in the Epistle of James (London
26
2008) 117.
DAVIDS, Epistle of James, 154.
27