John Makujina, «The Interpretation of Ps 144,14: Applying a Pluralistic Approach to a Manifold Difficulty», Vol. 92 (2011) 481-502
The interpretation of Ps 144,14 remains unsettled, due primarily to the difficulty of identifying an overall context for the colon. Of the two major positions dominating the debate, one contends that the topic of the entire verse is bovine fecundity, whereas the other considers part of the colon (v. 14b-c) to be about national security. The author finds both views to be problematic and proposes another solution, which retains attractive elements from each position: Ps 144,14 promises the prosperity of livestock, by assuring that they will not become the spoils of war.
		
			Biblica_1_Layout 1 20/01/12 11:44 Pagina 501
                                                                                       501
                                      THE INTERPRETATION OF PS 144,14
                and without argument.) The closest parallels belong to Puritan com-
                mentator Henry Ainsworth (1639) and Rabbi David Kimchi (1160-
                1235). Ainsworth claims that “none going out†means “no cattell
                driven away by the enemyâ€, while Kimchi asserts that tacwy is a
                reference to the non-captivity of both people and cattle 76. Although
                these expositors recognize the interrelationship between military
                hostilities and pastoralism, they also — in contrast to my position
                — understand tacwy as a direct activity against livestock. Other-
                wise, Cimosa mentions the possibility of cattle as tribute, but with
                respect to the !ac in v. 13 — rather than the ~ypwla in v. 14 — based,
                evidently, on the larger martial context of the psalm: “I greggi, non
                decimati dai tributi al nemico si moltiplicheranno, a decine di migli-
                aia nelle campagne e nei pascoli†77.
                                                *        *
                                                     *
                    The following reasons make this proposal more compelling
                than its predecessors: (1) it preserves the integrity of the Masoretic
                reading and the early versions, by not requiring any emendations
                (text or punctuation); (2) it fully exploits the virtues of the martial
                proposal, with its well attested meanings for the terms in v. 14b-c;
                (3) it maintains the parallelism between v. 13 and 14 (wnnwac and
                wnypwla; wnytwcwxb and wnytbxrb) and the continuity of v. 14, by re-
                taining the pastoral theme throughout the colon, instead of chang-
                ing topics midstream; (4) the theory is relatively uncomplicated,
                requiring only a minor realignment in orientation; (5) it addresses
                a genuine and well known threat to pastoralism; (6) it results in
                the fewest semantic difficulties and permits flexibility with the
                sense of ~ylbsm and tacwy; with respect to ~ylbsm, both “well cared
                for†and “well fed/healthy/strong†are entirely consistent with the
                proposed context of this verse, although “well cared for†is pre-
                ferred because of its superior documentation and self-sufficiency
                    76
                       H. AINSWORTH, Annotations upon the Five Books of Moses, the Booke
                of the Psalmes, and the Song of Songs, or, Canticles (London 1639) 185; KIM-
                CHI, Psalms CXX-CL, 127.
                    77
                       CIMOSA, Salmi 101-150, 333.