Matthew Thiessen, «Abolishers of the Law in Early Judaism and Matthew 5,17-20», Vol. 93 (2012) 543-556
Three times within Matt 5,17-20 passage Matthew uses the verb (kata)lu/w, signaling its importance. Consequently, I will focus on two historical events around which these words cluster: the Antiochan persecution and the destruction of the Temple. Since Jewish literature characterizes the Hellenizers of the Maccabean period as law abolishers, labeling a group as such implicated it in endangering the nation. As Josephus’ Jewish War demonstrates, after the Jewish Revolt, law abolishers were blamed for the Temple’s destruction. Thus, Matthew addresses the charge that Jesus abolished the law and, in so doing, brought about the destruction of the Temple.
04_Biblica_1_C_Thiessen_Layout 1 30/01/13 13:16 Pagina 549 04_B
ABOLISHERS OF THE LAW IN EARLY JUDAISM AND MATTHEW 5,17-20 549
Consider, too, the difficulty of preserving your religious rules from
contamination, even were you engaging a less formidable foe; and
how, if compelled to transgress the very principles on which you
chiefly build your hopes of God’s assistance, you will alienate Him
from you. If you observe your sabbath customs and refuse to take
any action on that day, you will undoubtedly be easily defeated, as
were your forefathers by Pompey, when the besieged remained in-
active; if, on the contrary, you transgress the law of your ancestors,
I fail to see what further object you will have for hostilities, since
your one aim is to preserve inviolate all the institutions of your fa-
thers (ga_r u(mi=n mi/a to_ mh_ tw~n patri/wn ti katalu~sai). How
could you invoke the aid of the Deity, after deliberately omitting
to pay Him the service which you owe Him? (B.J. 2.391-93)
Agrippa states that while the people are considering rebellion
because they do not want to abolish their ancestral customs, by
going to war they will cease Sabbath observance in order to fight,
thereby alienating themselves from God. Throughout his account
of the subsequent revolt, Josephus demonstrates the ways in which
the Zealots were guilty of this law abolishment and therefore
caused the destruction of both the city and the Temple. This con-
nection between Zealot law abolishment and divine wrath is made
evident by the numerous occurrences of katalu/w, lu/w, and
kata/lusij referring specifically to the actions of the Zealots
among the divided populace of Jerusalem during the war.
First, the Zealots choose a high priest by lot, a procedure which,
according to Josephus, is an abrogation (kata&lusij) of the estab-
lished practice (B.J. 4.154). As a result, many of the priests bemoan
this event, considering it to be the abolition of the priestly honours
(katalusij, B.J. 4.157). Further, John of Gischala tells the Zealots
&
that they would face the wrath of the people because they have
abolished their laws and law courts (u(pe\r katalu&sewj no&mwn
kai\ dikasthri/wn, B.J. 4.223). Similarly, Jesus the high priest ad-
dresses the Idumaeans in an attempt to gain their support against
the Zealots: “Join us in extirpating these tyrants, who have abol-
ished (katalu/santaj) our tribunals, trampled our laws†(B.J.
4.258). One Zealot even remorsefully confesses that both the Idu-
maeans and Zealots are guilty because they have “abolished the in-
stitutions of their forefathers†(katalu&ousi ta_ pa&tria, B.J.
4.348). Finally, according to Josephus, the Zealots leave the dead
unburied: “The Zealots, however, carried barbarity so far as to grant
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati