Matthew Thiessen, «Abolishers of the Law in Early Judaism and Matthew 5,17-20», Vol. 93 (2012) 543-556
Three times within Matt 5,17-20 passage Matthew uses the verb (kata)lu/w, signaling its importance. Consequently, I will focus on two historical events around which these words cluster: the Antiochan persecution and the destruction of the Temple. Since Jewish literature characterizes the Hellenizers of the Maccabean period as law abolishers, labeling a group as such implicated it in endangering the nation. As Josephus’ Jewish War demonstrates, after the Jewish Revolt, law abolishers were blamed for the Temple’s destruction. Thus, Matthew addresses the charge that Jesus abolished the law and, in so doing, brought about the destruction of the Temple.
04_Biblica_1_C_Thiessen_Layout 1 30/01/13 13:16 Pagina 554
554 MATTHEW THIESSEN
movement brought about the destruction of the Temple and God’s
wrath by pointing out the Pharisees’ law-keeping inadequacies 25.
As we have seen, Josephus blamed the events of 70 C.E. on the
Zealots whom he repeatedly accused of abolishing the law, demon-
strating the possibility that others laid the blame on Jewish followers
of Jesus, whom they viewed as law abolishers 26. It is conceivable
that a group competing for the loyalties of other Jews, such as the
Pharisees, argued that Jesus came to abolish the law and that his
movement was the cause of the destruction of Jerusalem. What bet-
ter way to discredit them as contenders for a leading role in the post-
70 Jewish community than to claim that Jesus himself was a law
abolisher? Matthew’s gospel should therefore be understood, in part,
as a response to such charges.
* *
*
I have argued that the threefold occurrence of the verbs katalu/w
and lu/w in Matt 5,17-20 is evidence of an accusation leveled at Jesus
and the Jewish community that followed him. It has been seen that
there is a high density of occurrences of these words in two locations
— accounts of the Antiochan persecution, and Josephus’s account of
the Zealots in the Jewish War. Matthew 5,17-20 should, therefore, be
read against the backdrop of these two verbal clusters. In these verses,
Matthew answers the dangerous accusation that his community mem-
bers are law abolishers and consequently a threat to all Jews. Just as
the authors of 2 and 4 Maccabees believed that the Jewish Hellenizers
brought about the Antiochan persecution, and just as Josephus argued
that the law-abolishing Zealots brought about the destruction of the
Temple and Jerusalem, so, too, some may have argued that Jewish-
Christian abandonment of ancestral customs occasioned divine wrath.
If so, the correct response of other Jewish groups to Matthew’s com-
munity should conform to Moses’ command, as mentioned by Jose-
Cf. D.M. MOFFITT, “Righteous Bloodshed, Matthew’s Passion Narrative
25
and the Temple’s Destruction: Lamentations as a Matthean Intertextâ€, JBL
125.2 (2006) 299-320.
Possible confirmation for this suggestion can be found in Josephus’s
26
claim that the high priest Ananus put James, the brother of Jesus, and some
of his companions to death on the accusation that they were law transgressors
(paranomhsa&ntoi, A.J. 20.200).
© Gregorian Biblical Press 2012 - Tutti i diritti riservati